European Defense Industry Cracking Down on UFO and ET Discussion
Article by Joe Martino March 1, 2021 (collective-evolution.com)
• There is now a rapidly building culture within governments of taking control of public narratives that are ‘controversial’. The European Commission’s Defence Industry and Space (DEFIS), announced that it will begin to crack down on online discussion relating to the ‘flat earth’, UFOs, and aliens, as they feel this is harmful disinformation. They intend on working within the EU Digital Services Act to put a censorship plan in place in the coming months. But who decides what is disinformation and what isn’t? How will the public even know what is being censored and what is not?
• There has been a veil of secrecy around the UFO subject for years. Governments deny what their own intelligence communities know to be real. When the US Navy released UFO videos a couple of years ago, people began to realize that a subject long ridiculed was in fact heavily studied by governments, even as authorities pretended nothing was there. How long might the government lie about other pieces of UFO/ET information before they admit it was true all along?
• What about evidence of ET bodies? We have credible whistleblowers from institutions who have stated unequivocally that government knows about different ET species and even has ET bodies in custody. Does the public trust them? Or are we too busy protecting our existing worldview to take an honest and unbiased look?
• It’s no secret that in recent years, many people have been losing trust in government and mainstream media due to a lack of transparency, ulterior agendas, and consistent lies. People have begun to look elsewhere for different perspectives. Independent media has gained a lot more influence when it comes to informing public perception. Those with a monopoly on information might not be too happy about this.
• The ‘flat earthers’ claim that the fact that the earth is flat is the biggest secret kept from humanity. YouTube channels popped up on the subject, documentaries were made, and even major NBA and pop culture influencers were on board. But it couldn’t be taken seriously, right? Is it possible that subjects like this are intentionally seeded out into the collective consciousness by intelligence agencies just to muddy the waters? Was it given so much algorithmic power on social media so that those manipulators of the narrative could point at it and say: “see, look what happens when people talk online, they believe crazy things.”
• This manipulation of the public conversation is exemplified by the ‘QAnon’ phenomenon. Was there a secret group of patriots working to inform the public that Trump and his team were poised to take down an evil cabal that ran the world? Leading up to the 2020 US election, mainstream media covered it constantly to insinuate that anyone who believed in Q was an unhinged, crazy, conspiracy theorist with sociopathic tendencies. Would it matter if there were actual evidence to support the controversial conversations people were having? It would appear no, it didn’t matter. The media culture has rendered all of these subjects as synonymous with extreme and unfounded views, and labeled as “crazy” anyone who doubted COVID and vaccines or believed in QAnon, UFOs, and aliens. This was extended to outright disavowing the Q movement and the election fraud narrative in order to prevent these sociopathic QAnons from shooting up Capitol Hill.
• QAnon has become a useful tool for widespread media censorship. But the fact is that some “conspiracies” are indeed real and the government does indeed lie to us. Still, other conspiracies are flat out false. This intentional ambiguity takes away from the legitimate information that needs to see the light of day. We have to be more discerning and critical in our thinking. If we aren’t careful as a culture, big tech and governments will work to shut down any inquiry into ‘fringe’ topics.
• Social media sites that have been labeled as ‘crazy QAnon people’ or ‘flat earthers’ are being shut down or demonetized en masse. It doesn’t matter that the subject is approached in a credible, evidence-based manner. They are guilty by association. Is it possible that powerful mainstream social engineers purposefully focus on extreme topics in order to bring down all of the other ‘uncontrollable’ conversations, such as UFOs, in the process? The extreme subjects act as a magnet to suck all ‘sound-alike’ conversations into the abyss of censorship. Should we be thinking more critically about which conspiracies are real and worth supporting and which are not, so that this mass cancel culture doesn’t cancel ALL of our conversation?
In a recent tweet from the European Commission’s Defense Industry and Space (DEFIS), they claimed they will begin to crack
down on online discussion relating to Flat Earth, UFOs, and Aliens as they feel there is disinformation permeating all sectors of our society when it comes to these subjects. They intend on working with the EU Digital Services Act to put a plan in place in the coming months.
Who knows what their plan will look like when it’s ready, but it falls in line with a rapidly building culture within government of taking mass control of narratives that are controversial and important to the general public. In the process, government and mainstream media seem to be the only ones allowed to have a voice anyone can hear.
At first glance, the move by DEFIS might seem a useful tactic, after all there is disinformation being spread about all of these topics. But who decides what is disinformation and what isn’t? What if information is in fact real and suddenly that content is ‘censored’ in the wide net that is cast to stop this apparent problem? How will the public even know what is being censored and what is not? Will this push control over who can talk about and disseminate ‘facts’ about these topics to mainstream media and government only?
Before we might jump into the idea that my questions above may come from a paranoid mind, let’s look at the facts.
There has been a long held veil of secrecy around the UFO subject for years. Governments deny realities that their own intelligence communities know are real. With the recent US Navy UFO videos that were released a couple of years ago, people began to realize that a subject long ridiculed was in fact heavily studied by governments, even as they pretended as if nothing was there. This caused a huge resurgence in a fascinating topic that deeply touches the very worldviews that inspire how we design and live our lives.
In 2017 when we all saw the US Navy footage released, did it not suggest that perhaps the US government had known about this phenomenon for decades? How long might government lie about other pieces of information related to the UFO topic before they come out saying it was true all along? Like they did in 2019, confirming the Navy footage was authentic.
Let’s take a quick look at the next obvious question people ask when thinking about a UFO sighting: “Who is manning that craft? A human? An ET? Is it remote controlled?”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. ExoNews.org distributes this material for the purpose of news reporting, educational research, comment and criticism, constituting Fair Use under 17 U.S.C § 107. Please contact the Editor at ExoNews with any copyright issue.