Tag: Alexander Berezin

We Will Never See Aliens ‘Because We’ll Destroy Them’, Expert Fears

“Alexander Berezin, a theoretical physicist from the National Research University of Electronic Technology in Russia”

by Sebastian Kettley                       June 4, 2019                    (express.co.uk)

• Alexander Berezin, a theoretical physicist from the National Research University of Electronic Technology in Russia, thinks that he has solved Fermi’s Paradox by suggesting that any civilization that does reach the advanced level of interstellar space travel will likely fuel the demise of other species in order to feed its own expansion. In other words, we may unintentionally bring to a halt a budding species, just as a more advanced species may unintentionally bring ours to a halt in their ‘unchecked expansion’.

• Dr Berezin wrote: “I am not suggesting that a highly developed civilization would consciously wipe out other lifeforms.” “Most likely, they simply won’t notice, the same way a construction crew demolishes an anthill to build real estate because they lack incentive to protect it.”

• Alien life exists in all shapes and sizes somewhere out there in space, according to the Fermi Paradox. Proposed in the 1970’s and named after the physicist Enrico Fermi, the paradox estimates the probability that intelligent alien civilizations exist, even if we have never seen proof.

• But life, says Dr Berezin, is not a mirror-image of the human-like lifeforms. “The cornerstone of the problem is our model of life in the general case.” “[T]here is no possible way of accounting for all lifeforms that may rise independently throughout the universe.” These could be biological lifeforms similar to humans, or ‘rogue’ AIs that rebelled against their creators. And they do not have to be technologically advanced and interstellar in order to matter.

[Editor’s Note]   This article was picked up from Russia by a British website because it supports the Deep State agenda.  Mainstream scientists and intellectuals in the West are encouraged by the puppet masters to ignore the true extraterrestrial presence, and instead replace the truth with re-imagined theories of alien worlds unknown to man. These so-called “expert” theories are promoted as if they are a legitimate ‘belief’. It bolsters a false reality that there really is no extraterrestrial presence, regardless of an abundance of evidence to the contrary. This sort of scientific hogwash serves to muddy the waters so that the average person will give up even trying to understand the truth at all.

 

Alien life in all shapes and size exists somewhere out there in the depths of space, at least according to the Fermi Paradox. The theoretical principal stipulates life has to exist in a universe full of infinite stars and planets, most of which are older than our Earth and solar system. Proposed in the 1970s and named after the physicist Enrico Fermi, the paradox estimates the probability intelligent alien civilisations exist even if we have never seen proof. However, even if evidence of alien life exists somewhere out there in space, odds are humans will destroy it before we even realise.

The unfortunate theory was proposed by theoretical physicist Alexander Berezin from the National Research University of Electronic Technology in Russia.

In a bid to explain the Fermi Paradox or why aliens have not visited the Earth yet, the scientist proposed some hard truths about where he thinks humanity is headed.

According to the scientist’s “First in, last out” proposal, pre-published on arXiv.org, scientists have trivialised the meaning of alien life.

In his opinion, alien life does not have to be a mirror-image of the human-like lifeforms we have grown accustomed to.
He wrote: “The cornerstone of the problem is our model of life in the general case.

“Many proposed solutions take the narrowest definition of Earth-like life and still struggle to come up with any sufficient explanation as to why no life has arisen on any other Earth-like planet, the existence of which seems no longer debated.

“However, such a narrow definition is clearly wrong. Even those organisms descending from one common ancestor with ourselves have proven time and time again that we drastically underestimate to what conditions life is able to adapt.
“And there is no possible way of accounting for all lifeforms that may rise independently throughout the universe.
“Because of that we have to create a definition that is substrate-invariant.”

READ ENTIRE ARTICLE

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. ExoNews.org distributes this material for the purpose of news reporting, educational research, comment and criticism, constituting Fair Use under 17 U.S.C § 107. Please contact the Editor at ExoNews with any copyright issue.

Copyright © 2019 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.