• Home
  • Exonews
  • Knowledge of ET Life is Maturing at Warp Speed says paradigm activist

Knowledge of ET Life is Maturing at Warp Speed says paradigm activist

Pin It
Steve Bassett at National Press Club

When venturing into the uncertain mine field of the extraterrestrial issue, an often side-lined or forgotten fact remains at the core of it: that we the people still outnumber the prevailing elite.  If the call to arms from the Exopolitical perspective demands that the people must be impelled to political action, then Stephen Bassett is a living testament to this.  He reminded us of the necessity for action when his usual, energetic style of dialogue filled the airwaves during his recent interview on the esteemed Coast to Coast am, on Monday 25th July 2011.  Bassett has, arguably, come to represent this particular form of Exopolitical activism.  His popularity with the people likely stems, in part, from his modus operandi to enlist them as recruits in the hero’s journey; a quest that evokes a powerful metaphor, traversing gender, religion, culture and time.  It speaks to the human condition and engages the psyche on a profound level.   As co-creators, Bassett speaks directly to the people and invites them to weave the tapestry of change.   The most recent opportunity to do so has arrived in the form of World Disclosure Day.  This, he tells George Noory, is a chance for the people, alongside sympathetic organisations, to register their support in an attempt to speed up the process of extraterrestrial disclosure by the governments.

At the beginning of the interview, Noory remarks upon the recent discord amongst some in the MUFON camp to enlist Story Musgrave, a retired NASA astronaut, as the keynote speaker for the upcoming MUFON 2011 Symposium.   The resistance is due to Musgrave’s assertion that, although he believes that life in the universe exists, he does not believe that the Earth has been visited by extra-terrestrial intelligences.  Bassett’s position on this is clear: that people arrive at the reality of the extraterrestrial presence via their own, personal mechanisms.  Alongside this, Bassett maintains that the issue of what astronauts may or may not be permitted to speak about is essentially unknown.   This inclusive approach is one that the sceptics usually fail to adopt when addressing the UFO community, and perhaps Bassett’s perspective reflects a move towards a more mature understanding of the phenomenon, born out of Bassett’s own personal journey of having to navigate the sometimes uncomfortable and difficult terrain of validating the UFO in consensus reality.  From this perspective, Bassett finds room to accommodate the difficulties that any civilian agency, such as NASA, would surely encounter if suddenly confronted with the proof of advanced extraterrestrial existence; a discovery that would inevitably result in its deferral to the U.S Department of Defense.  A clause in the Space Act, it appears, has pre-determined this scenario.  As Bassett informs Noory, NASA is ‘stuck between a rock and a hard place’.  There is hope, however, as Bassett implies.  The scale of probability for the existence of intelligent life seems set to tip in our favour.

An acceptance of the likelihood of intelligent species showing up in our reality has perhaps become a little easier for the mainstream to digest since the recent estimates by the Kepler scientists of some fifty billion planets in the Milky Way Galaxy.  Five hundred million of these reside in the Goldilocks Zone, an area that supports the existence of Earth like planets.  The possibility of intelligent life beyond the Geostationary Earth Orbit is ‘maturing at warp speed’.  That being said, Bassett’s approach of initiating an inclusive strategy in the fight for disclosure is evident in his statement that a ‘bridging into the larger world’ must be attempted.  Of course, any such effort is commendable, but this endeavour has not always proven to be a successful one in the past, for the old guard faction of Ufology at least.  It did, in fact, create a paradox.   In their race to convince the sceptics and mainstream society of the reality of unknown, intelligent species visiting the Earth, a reductive paradigm was established to select evidence on the basis of its’ credibility gage.   Ufologists were expected to strictly adhere to the parameters of authoritative, scientific discourse.   Strands were selected while others were discarded, despite the risk of consigning aspects of the phenomenon – frequently those that revealed a high level of strangeness – to the rubbish heap.   These self-imposed restrictions left the sceptics unimpressed, as those in the UFO community were still denounced as little more than believers.  Bassett, however, demonstrates an awareness of this.   Although not explicitly stated, he highlights a subtle distinction in his shrewd observation that Edgar Mitchell is not a ‘believer’, in the sense of how this term is usually employed, but rather he is ‘convinced’ of the reality of UFOs.  Edgar Mitchell of course, being able to add space exploration to his CV, is certainly more qualified than the sceptics to assert this.  Arguably though, the rise of quantum theory in popular culture has illuminated the path of the hero’s journey and has perhaps helped us to move more confidently towards an expanded awareness of our reality, enabling us to break out of such a chrysalis.  Certainly, we are living in different times now, as the experiencer phenomenon is now an accepted paradigm in mainstream Ufology.

Bassett remarks that a part of his role is to look for ‘disclosure indicators’.  A couple of main ones have already occurred; the suspension of SETI and the US Space Shuttle program.   These programs, Bassett maintains, are unsupportable and would warrant the additional criticism of governments in a world after Disclosure.   Additionally, Bassett astutely discerns that the next ‘big’ topic in the disclosure process is the rise of the contactee.   He cites public figures that have already stepped forward into the public arena and predicts that more will follow suit.  Of course, the impact of this would be significant in terms of bringing the issue to mainstream attention.   Alongside this process, however, it is essential to remember that extensive and dynamic work should also be carried out for the purpose of deepening our understanding of what is occurring in the contactee narrative.  For this work, detailed experiencer accounts already exist, but we have barely scratched the surface of understanding the implications and the purpose of inter-dimensional and (or) extraterrestrial visitation.

As the interview draws to a close, Noory seeks to understand the driving force behind Bassett’s pursuit of disclosure.  His recognisable brand of humour takes hold as he remarks that ‘an obsessive compulsive personality with an inability to hold down a regular job’, when faced with a ‘compelling’ issue, has determined his journey in life.   Humour aside, his determination to make a difference is evident throughout.  It is this resolve to put the disclosure issue centre stage that enables him to acknowledge the work being done by others.   Of notable mention is David Griffin’s, the founder of Exopolitics United Kingdom, contribution to the Exopolitical initiative in the UK, and Kim Carlsberg significant book, The Art of Close Encounters, is also discussed.  The prolific blogger and activist, Ed Komarek, is cited during the interview, and Anthony Beckett’s organising of the Leeds Exopolitics conferences in the UK receives a mention.  In addition, the immense contribution to the field of Ufology by Stanton Friedman and Linda Moulton Howe is highlighted.

One thing is clear.   By the time the listener arrives at the end of the Coast to Coast journey, they are left with a sense of the potential to make a difference.  Stephen Bassett’s Exopolitical activism seems set to continue, and a little thing such as the current state of non-Disclosure is unlikely to deter him from his journey.

In a further interview carried out in the run up to the UK Exopolitics Event in Leeds, Bassett expanded on how the contactee or ‘experiencer’ phenomenon would become increasingly important in the exopolitical field in the future. This is a notable shift when many researchers prefer to prioritise elements such as FOIA File Release and ‘reliable’ witness statements such as those documented by pilots and downplay ‘citizen’ type witness or experiencer data due to its ‘kooky’ image. The hour long discussion can be streamed or downloaded here: http://bit.ly/sbassET

For a detailed and alternative reading of the contactee narrative then please refer to the recent edition of the Exopolitics Journal: http://exopoliticsjournal.com/. Stephen Bassett will be speaking at the 2011 Leeds Exopolitics conference.  His talk is entitled ‘Disclosure: Who, What, Why, When, Where and How’.  To register you support for World Disclosure Day please visit:http://www.worlddisclosureday.org/

By Natasha Acimovic

Submitted by David Griffin - http://exopoliticsunitedkingdom.org

Pin It


  • As spectacular as an official governmental disclosure would be, perhaps we should ask ourselves if this would be the best way for it to happen. (Of course, some unforeseeable event could happen which simply forces the hand of government to make the disclosure, but for the time being let’s imagine that on some level, the masses influence how the final stages of disclosure would finally unfold.)

    Governments around the world have managed to prevent disclosure for many years. Along the way, in the name of national security, careers and families were ruined, people were hurt (sometimes worse), personal property was stolen by “authorities”, censorship was approved at the highest levels, people who paid good tax money in the amount of untold billions received something very special in return called “disinformation”, and two generations of people including the fine minds within science and the military have been conditioned to scoff at the notion of ET being here at all. I could go on but the point is made.

    All this horrible behavior at the hands of those in whom we place our trust may have nearly made sense not knowing in 1947 how the world may react to the idea of aliens from outer space. Somewhere along the way, somewhere between atomic bombs and today’s catastrophe-of-the-week world it has become clear that as a civilization we can handle quite a fair bit without going mad. (If I see one more ‘man vs. aliens’ movie I MIGHT go mad, though.) Further, the military was only intended to deal with threats from Earth. In the event of a true threat coming from somewhere else in the universe, though we could expect the military to do its utmost to save us, no one really expects them to prevail over technology from another world that may be millions of years ahead of us.

    At this point, it is not so much that anyone NEEDS to have a governmentally approved disclosure as it is that we need, for once, for those in positions of authority to treat us with the respect dignity they often lavish upon each other. Even if some world leader came forward and said that many mistakes have been made along the way, some bad decisions were made and while we can’t change the past we can and will improve now, THAT would help me feel as though we really are evolving in a good way, finally. Imagine the powers that be treating us like the family, friends and neighbors we have always been. In the end, in the post-disclosure world, we are all going to be in the position of having to accept ET’s presence as well as having to accept a revision to how we perceive our place in this universe. All of us have a “need-to-know”.

    I, for one, would have an easier time managing disclosure coming from the mouth of a farmer in Iowa, a nun in Italy, a pilot from Peru or an tenth grader from Japan than from a government-appointed figure. People who do not have to put a spin on something at the direction of a boss are easier for me to assess, to believe or not. About the last person I want to hear it from is a politician acting as a government spokesperson.
    (apologies to all honest politicians out there).

    What’s that? Something like this has already happened? Yes, I know. I have even seen reports by ‘experiencers” whom I believe. One need not look far to find such a report. This is one of the reasons I maintain that disclosure has already occurred. Governments are painting themselves into an ever-darke

    ning corner by attempting to maintain a ridiculous position through silence or denial. It has really gotten to the point now where I don’t need to see Germany to know that Germany exists. Lot’s of good, credible folks have seen Germany. You don’t think valid extraterrestrial sightings are as common? Maybe they’re not, but the numbers are certainly increasing at warp speed.

    An Afterthought: Maybe it is because ET does not want to be treated with government gloves that no landings occur on the Whitehouse lawn. Rumor has it this was tried in the past but it did not work out so well.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2019 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.