• Home
  • Science & Technology

The Quantum Hologram Harmonizes Two Important UFO Hypotheses

Edgar MitchellThe Quantum Hologram model proposed by Dr. Edgar Mitchell (seen in the photograph), Dr. Rudy Schild , Dr. Walter Schemp and other capable scientists valiantly expanding theoretical constructs that may better explain ‘anomalies’ and empirical data (however unconventional it may be)… should be studied. This model includes and transcends a net physical explanation that some UFOs – if genuine – are physical machines or devices. This valid hypothesis (largely based on the recorded physical effects of UFO’s) is also often associated with the ETH or “extraterrestrial hypothesis” (normally associated – but not limited – to the idea of technological advanced physical beings, for instance, as proposed by physicist Dr. Stanton Friedman). However, the Quantum Hologram (or QH) also includes and transcends the hypothesis that some genuine UFOs can well be some sort of mind-like, information-control mechanism which can be interpreted also as cybernetic-like (as proposed by Jacques Vallée’s ‘software’ – like, information control mechanism which can exert control on our reality, our minds and society and which – curiously enough – can also be theoretically invaded and modified by human agency). Needless to say, the latter position can also be confounded with UFO entities thought to be limited to existence as spiritual beings but that is another discussion.

So – to simplify – is the UFO phenomenon primarily based on technologically advanced physical machines (the nuts & bolts approach) or is it an  information control mechanism as Dr. Jacques Vallée proposes? It is BOTH through a reality and mechanism that includes and transcends both interpretations. That reality and mechanism would be the Quantum Hologram and – if it becomes useful to solve the UFO quandary and other so-called “paraphysical” quandaries- it is bound to become widespread news as part of a more complete, scientifically robust proposal applicable both to conventional physics and to the unconventional (more mind-interacting) physics of UFOs and other phenomena that combine the qualitative, subjetive, meaningful and experiential with the objective and material.

 With the Quantum Hologram approach we need not have to choose between either the nuts & bolts or the information options. Both can be seen as integrated.

A sophisticated understanding of the QH would be what many advanced extraterrestrial civilizations would have mastered to “collapse” space-time and-or to transfer themselves by delocalizing themselves from physicality and then “materializing” to the region of physical universe desired. The information aspect of the QH would define the type of physicality these beings may be able to “relocate” themselves in, including variable physical densities, time frames and time frequency rates. Moreover, the term “Interdimensional” could acquire a more nuanced and precise meaning.

 The QH would supplement other forms of achieving dettachment from classical physical limitations, such as the canceling of gravitons through the generation of micro black holes and Kaluza-Klein particles (associated to a 5th spatial dimension) and Alcubierre space-time metric distorsions (about which I’ve written elsewhere in Exonews here and here).

The QH may also supplement the findings of Nassim Haramein about the geometric structures maintaining vectorial equilibrium of forces and interconnecting all of space-time at the vacuum level.

The QH reconciles apparent irreconcilable opposites through its compatibility with a “both-and” explanation, a more inclusive, relational logic or way of thinking with a third ontologically real element existing in a higher level of reality as transdisciplinarity philosopher Basarab Nicolescu might agree. The emerging science and society suitable for living more sanely under the recognition of non-local interconnectivity and its effects on classic space-time would quite likely make use of this kind of more inclusive logic and, moreover, corresponding technological advances would ensue.

Without this logic of deeper relationship and complementarities capable of assisting us to generate a more complex (and simultaneously more fundamental and simpler) worldview of greater unity and connectivity and of being engineered with concrete “para” physical effects, the fragmenting tendencies of human societies – instinctively and academically – operating for the most part under classic, binary, two-value logic will be incongruous with the need to harmonize the human species on a planetary scale, now that we are experiencing ever-growing complexity, interdependence, an increase in uncertainty and interconnectivity.

The news here is that, to create a viable planetary society capable of intelligently dealing with many exopolitical situations (as humanity’s political relations with intelligences that may surpass and ‘control’ spacetime), we’ll need to grow up in order to function in practical manners under that more inclusive “both-and logic” with an included middle also compatible with the QH model representing a higher level of reality reconciling classical opposites. Thus, we urgently need to know more about why the QH model is helpful on many respects.

The QH Model (Quantum Hologram Model) possesses a key aspect interpreted as information frequencies (currently under Fourier Transform mathematics). Every physical object can be re-interpreted as these frequencies. It also possesses a classical, physical, particulate aspect when the coherent decodifiers of those frequencies coincide with those frequencies. Thus, the QH acommodates both informational and physical complementary aspects of a more integrated reality. It would be an expression of the science of the future emerging today and useful to help us overcome some of the “either-or” dichotomies limiting the human mind and our experiences to a life of disconnection within the confines of space and time separation. It may be useful to establish any intelligent, future dialogue with physical beings capable of collapsing and modifying space-time by using a more inclusive, pre-physical reality and its associated logic.

The QH model would be compatible with my proposal about the role of experience and observation and the corresponding  actualization of (time forward and time-backward) wave function possibilities (originating in a pre-physical, purely informational, subtle-mental realm in which exterior ‘objects’ and “systems” are equally co-causal with interior, subjective and intersubjective experiences). The vaster array of experiential possibilities themselves would be ‘reduced’ or limited to a set of probabilities coinciding with a particular physical system’s self-consistency and coherence a perspective from which the experienced observation is made. Future possibilities as causes and past causes as possibilities would be combined to achieve the observational coherence under what may be called (in Inca-Andean terms) a “Tinkuy” or creative coming together of worlds.

In my view the Quantum Hologram would be an interphase between all possibilities allowed by the mental subtle realm of existence causally operating under a more inclusive logic and all posible coherent physical universes or systems causally operating under a classical logic. This decodification and actualization (also as a form of decoherence) might perhaps extend to all fractal scales (also within the vacuum itself), particularly if there is a form of panpsychism also capable of different degrees of decohering observation-experience in every scale.

Besides that “mouthful” or complex phrasing about emerging explanatory concepts that – in my view – are necessary and can also be consistently associated with the QH, I reiterate that the news here (the good news here) is that the QH model is already capable of acommodating two of the most important interpretive positions that stand to reason to be the nature of genuine, sufficiently verified, intelligently interacting, ‘otherworldly’ UFOs:

A ‘software-cybernetic-information’ interpretive position about their mind-like and-or information-like-modifying quality affecting physical nature, our minds and society and the more classical “nuts & bolts” interpretive position so popular in classical scientific ufology (or of ufology attempting to be as scientific as posible under classical thinking) and an interpretive physicalist “nuts & bolts” position, especially noted during the late 1940’s “Project Sign” era and during the 1950’s contactee era in which “flying saucers” where seriously (and mostly exclusivistically) considered to be physical devices. The QH simultaneosuly acommodates what can be called a “virtual,” information-aspect described as frequencies and a solid, material, “within space-time” aspect.

Now we have a model that ushers in part of what we need to know. It ushers in the future by acommodating both basic interpretive positions and may even be useful to bring the UFO mystery into a more scientifically-pallatable framework, helping scientists interested in this subject  to “come out of the closet” whilst  maintaining their credibility and respectability.

 See the video from Dr. Rudy Schild conference: “Modern Miracles and the Quantum Hologram”

What is the Quantum Hologram? Brief essay by Dr. Edgar Mitchell

By Giorgio Piacenza

Futuristic Airbus design mimics antigravity UFO

Airbus flying bagelAirbus has filed a new patent for a UFO-like airplane that looks like something right out of a Sci Fi movie. RT today described the radical Airbus design as a “bagel plane” where passengers sit in a ring. The Financial Times, which was the first to announce the new design in a November 16 story, reported that the UFO-like shape addresses key structural problems faced by aircraft engineers for cylindrical designs. Will the new Airbus design use a traditional propulsion system such as aviation fuel that is currently the standard for civilian aircraft? The UFO-like design makes more sense if Airbus was preparing for an innovative future propulsion system for the aviation industry – antigravity!

The Airbus Patent application says that the design attempts to address the structural problems created by cylindrical shaped aircraft with have to deal with huge air pressures at the front and back:

The present invention proposes an aircraft wherein the structure delimiting passenger cabin extends over 360 degrees around a space defined outside structure. The invention allows structure to be more resistant to loads induced by the cabin pressurization, while allowing to reduce or even to avoid the need for a sealed bottom ….

Avoiding “a sealed bottom” leads to one of the most radical differences with conventional aircraft as the Financial Times describes regarding the “flying doughnut”: “Diagrams in the patent application show passengers entering the aircraft through steps leading up to doors arranged around the hole in the doughnut’s middle.”

Aviation experts are skeptical that the UFO-like design is feasible. Loren Thompson from the Lexington Institute told the Financial Times: “I’ve never seen anyone suggest anything like this in a heavier-than-air system,” Thompson’s skepticism is understandable given current fuel propulsion systems for the aviation industry. So is there an alternative propulsion system that might make the Airbus design feasible?

Classified antigravity technologies have been secretly developed by military-corporate entities, but kept from the public realm for over six decades. It was revealed in 1992, for example, that the B-2 Bomber used electrostatic charges on its leading wings and exhaust.  According to aerospace experts, this was confirmation that the B-2 used electrogravitic principles based on the Biefeld-Brown Effect.  The Biefeld-Brown Effect is based on the research of Thomas Townsend Brown who in 1928 gained a patent for his practical application of how high voltage electrostatic charges can reduce the weight of objects. The B-2 bomber employs sufficiently high voltages to significantly reduce its weight. This enables the B-2 and other classified antigravity vehicles to display flight characteristics that appear to defy conventional laws of physics.

In 2002, an internal Boeing project called “Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion” (GRASP) was disclosed to the aerospace industry. A GRASP briefing document obtained by Jane’s Defense Weekly stated Boeing’s position: “If gravity modification is real, it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

According to a 2008 book by Dr Paul LaViolette, Secrets of Antigravity Technology, Boeing completed a separate classified study for the U.S. military of electrogravitic propulsion before October 2007. Boeing was rebuffed in its efforts to have such technology declassified and released into the public sector. The Airbus patent for a UFO-like “flying bagel” is the future of the aviation industry once antigravity technologies are declassified into the public arena. Perhaps on the insiders track, Airbus knows something we don’t, and is getting ready for a future when “flying bagels” fill the skies!

 © Copyright 2014. Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Exopolitics.org

Rosetta comet radio signals and UFO claims spark controversy

Comet 67 P UFO
Image Source: UFO Sightings Daily

The Huffington Post today attempted to debunk claims that Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is transmitting radio signals and may in fact be an ancient spaceship. Post writer Michael Rundle picked up on an earlier September 29 story released on the popular UFO Sightings Daily blogsite titled: “NASA Records Radio Signals Coming From Comet 67P For Over 20 Years!” The UFO Sightings Daily story repeated claims made a week earlier in a Youtube video that is going viral allegedly showing UFOs and a radio transmission tower on Comet 67P. Rundle concludes that the claims are a sensationalist take on flimsy evidence. Is he correct?

First, let’s start with last week’s announcement that the European Space Agency’s Rosetta Mission had set November 12 as the date that its lander, Philae, would land on the 2.5 x 2.2 mile Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The scheduled landing will be the first time that a spacecraft will have successfully landed on a comet. In 2005, Japan’s Hayabusa spacecraft failed in its landing attempt on another asteroid. For astrobiologists, the landing will be an opportunity to look for and examine any organic materials on Comet 67P to assess their potential as building blocks for life. If Comet 67P is found to contain amino acids, for example, that would make it possible that comets are an effective means to disseminate organic material essential for the creation of life. This would make the comet landing a continuation of a long series of NASA and ESA missions to find where the conditions for life may be found on our solar system.

A recent photograph of the comet taken by the Rosetta spacecraft suggest another reason for the mission. According to BPEarthWatch’s Youtube video one of these photos reveals a number of UFOs flying over the surface of Comet 67P and what looks like a radio transmission tower. BP Watch also displayed an anonymous email from an alleged ESA insider who claims that the Rosetta mission was indeed established to investigate radio signals detected 20 years ago suggestive of an extraterrestrial intelligence in association with the comet. Scott Waring from UFO Sightings agreed and posted his endorsement of BPEarthWatch’s claims on September 28.

The images are too blurry to conclude anything according to Rundle, who in addition points out that the claims fail to address a number of questions:

If the comet is emitting radio waves, why has no one else been able to tune it? If there are UFOs inside, why haven’t they been caught in any detail in any of the hundreds of high-resolution photographs taken by the comet? If the radio waves were picked up by NASA, why did they leave the space mission to investigate to the European Space Agency?

While one can agree with Rundle’s assessment that the blurred objects in the photograph are inconclusive, that is not the same as saying they are NOT artificial objects. Furthermore, his questions fail to acknowledge NASA’s long history of deceiving the public over evidence of extraterrestrial life. For example, on August 19, Russian scientists announced that they had discovered microbes flourishing on the windows of the International Space Station. If true, this would show that microbial life could exist in the vacuum of space. This would revolutionize the scientific understanding of how life can be disseminated through space via comets, thereby lending critical support to the theory of Panspermia. What was NASA’s response to this significant public revelation by Russian scientists? Silence!

There are other examples of NASA deliberately muzzling evidence pointing to the existence of extraterrestrial life. Veteran scientists such as Richard Hoover, who worked for NASA for 46 years, have publicly disagreed with NASA’s muzzling which goes high up the chain of command.

In response to Rundle’s questions, it may be that NASA, with the cooperation of the European Space Agency, is again muzzling evidence of extraterrestrial life. A dissident scientist from the European Space Agency may well have leaked the truth about Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko through an anonymous email. Based on the photos released so far by the Rosetta Mission showing a tower-like structure, Comet 67P may be transmitting radio signals that were picked up as long as 20 years ago by NASA, and has UFOs flying on its surface. On the other hand, Rundle might be right, and the most we can look forward to after November 12 is that some amino acids are found on the surface of Comet 67P lending support to the theory of Panspermia.

© Copyright 2014. Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Exopolitics.org

Copyright © 2018 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.