Tag: abduction

Types of Contacts

First we have to assess how many types of contacts with intelligent non-human beings there might be. Since there might be other intelligent beings that we could consider as “human,” by “non-human” I mean non-homo sapiens as the intelligent species predominant on the Earth’s surface.

Classical contacts” (with human-like beings), voluntary conscious contacts, typically with “older brothers.” Typically by invitation and telepathy. They are more communicative. In many cases, classical contactees (like George Adamski, Sixto Paz) are asked to write a book, give lectures or share in other ways a positive, transformative message.

“Abductions,” but most would not be abducted by negative beings although morbidly some researchers and in films tend to emphasize that. In many cases they include teaching or preparation, transmission of symbols and languages, sometimes children. Often, “abductions” evolved to acquire the characteristics of “classical contacts.”

Contacted by the fact of participating in highly classified unacknowledged ‘government’ extraterrestrial research and/or in secret space programs. It is a very controversial subject that currently divides ufology. Persons like Bill UHouse and possibly persons like Corey Goode, Dan Burisch, Andrew Basiago, Randy Cramer, William M. Tompkins represent this possibility. Testimonial evidence is admissible as when inside a court the jury seeks to evaluate the consistency or contradictions between the testimonies and may use any documentary and physical evidence that supports or contradicts the testimonies.

“Inter-reality” physical and inter-reality non-physical (often simply called “Interdimensional” which may include mental, astral, lucid dream contacts, contacts during deep hypnosis or during near-death experiences.

“Experiencer” contacts (general term referring to the person living experiences of contact with intelligent non-human beings. A Category that covers a wide range of events (including contacts with physical beings of diverse appearance and level of development, with forms of energy as well as non-physical contacts) and subsumes the previous four forms of contact. Some experiencers describe what seem to be more spiritually evolved entities giving loftier messages others describe more matter-of-fact, perhaps scientifically inclined entities and still others describe entities engaged in human-like (and movie-like) civilizational conflicts and alliances amongst various groups even with human military and secret factions.

In all cases telepathy seems to play a common role. The importance of consciousness as a key factor transcending and connecting realities is generally acknowledged.

As for contacts with perceptible physical beings, people generally describe energetic and / or spheroid forms, human form, small gray, tall gray, reptilian, insectoid, animal, and other forms.

The F.R.E.E. survey in which thousands of persons (who preferably recall in a conscious manner their experiencer memories and who anonymously describe them by responding to hundreds of quantitative and qualitative questions) reveals that a majority of contact experiences are considered not to be “evil” or “negative.”  Besides that, most tend to have a positive, life transforming effect.  Moreover, the varieties of beings most described are: energy beings and/or orbs, beings with a human appearance, short grays, large grays, reptilian, insectoid, animal-like forms, others.  The F.R.E.E. link is www.experiencer.org 

In most cases all types of contacts are initially described as surprising and/or scary and generating difficulties in terms of sharing the experiences with family, friends, spouses, co-workers, and society at large. While there may be some negative and perhaps “evil” experiences, most are found not to be such after the initial phases of fear and surprise are overcome. What is most important is how we as humans react or respond to these situations.

Exopolitical Considerations – Part I

There are many descriptions about the alleged unity, disunity and variety of beings within the cosmic community apparently visiting or interacting with us; descriptions competing for what can be considered important to be of exopolitical relevance. Are some or all of them benevolent, evil, both or neither? What are thousands of persons experiencing or claiming to be experiencing around the world? Who among these alleged “visitors” should we try to purposefully contact to establish a peaceful and constructive civilian exopolitical relationship?

Exopolitical Considerations – Part II

In the F.R.E.E. survey, besides some information about MILABS (human military abductions associated with some “experiencers”) there has thus far not been much of a description about a secret space program (at least of the more astounding kind) as described by persons like Andrew Basiago, Corey Goode, Randy Cramer, William Tompkins. In my view, this doesn’t necessarily invalidate these descriptions of the Secret Space Program (SSP) just like F.R.E.E. doesn’t necessarily invalidate some or all of the information acquired through hypnosis by researchers that receive more traumatized abductees. What it shows is that the SSP information and the traumatized abductee information may be gathered by researchers focusing on persons that come to them to give to them those specific types of information. They might still be a subset of the general experiencer population not reflected in a survey like F.R.E.E.’s.

Since we are on a data-gathering stage my approach tends to be inclusive and non-dismissive of the various aforementioned descriptions, mostly gathered from contactees, abductees, experiencers in general, and whistleblowers. I try to withhold dismissing judgments and to maintain a neutral attitude until enough corroboration or rebuttal of particular claims is available.

My opinion is that we need to learn to be integrative; that is, to live under the underlying principles behind a science that understands the coherence between subjective and objective aspects of reality. And this requires of us to stop thinking so exclusively in terms of an either-or dualistic, dichotomous logic. This would involve being able not to react so emotionally and to suspend judgment even when we hear particular descriptions about the extraterrestrial presence which we find “preposterous.” The quite eager degree of mutual dismissal among individuals within the various branches of what could be called “the disclosure movement” may signal to other intelligences that we are not psychologically ready to integrate the many facets of our human-non- human connections.

Since contact phenomena appear to refer to a deeper level of meaningful connectivity existing in the cosmos, we would also need to change our cultural epistemological foundations toward a deeper cultural understanding to non-destructively harness a conscious non-local access to a science and technology that transcends the classical limits of space-time. Such a science and technology would require from us to get acclimatized to living under non-classic laws, easily experiencing phenomena that now seem strange, laughable, silly or outrageous to us.

Showing a greater degree of unity within the community of individuals exploring UFO, exopolitics, experiencer and related matters would reflect a greater resonance with a coherent, non-local information matrix. It might signal a greater arising degree of maturity in our species for which we would be treated more as sovereign beings and less as immature, self-destructive children playing with fire.

Thus, how do we unlearn to react in the same old ways always seeking self-assertion of our beliefs, premises and identities while easily dismissing whatever truths others may be expressing?  Perhaps by beginning to move in another way.

Scientists and experiencers coming together with mutual respect in order to establish solid evidence would also signal this move toward the maturity needed for an open disclosure to be supported by some of our “visitors” who might – in turn – shown up in more objective and undeniable ways.

In my opinion, we need to attempt to establish an easier communicative relationship with all plausible non-human intelligences but it would be easier to start doing so with more human like beings by working with CE-5 approaches inclusive of open-minded, respectful scientists working a few bona fide contactees.

Exopolitical Considerations – Part III

These are trying times for sustaining the basis of a reasonable and rational civilization at large.Since exopolitics, experiencer research and ufology touch upon issues whose content for many already constitute “fake news”  we are facing a greater challenge to establish and coherently connect the kernel of truth behind all of what is being testified, known or believed.

We seem to cherish finding immediate reasons to dismiss each others’ beliefs, assertions, and truths if they compete with our preferred truths just as many of us compete for being the most influential voices among the segment of the population that cares about whether we are actually being visited or not.  What we are seeing now in an era in which truth is being challenged by fake news and in which belief often trumps objectivity and the foundations for a civilized public discourse extends into exopolitics. In a year that marks the 70th anniversary of the beginning of the “modern era of UFOs” and after decades of needing “physical evidence” that there might be other intelligent non-human civilizations, many are self-righteously jumping into dismissive condemnatory remarks about such plausible evidence emerging, for instance, under the alleged discovery of humanoid mummies in Nazca, Peru.  It is like a test to see if we are able to withhold conclusive judgments and to come together in the name of truth.  The same may be happening in relation to how “wild” the Secret Space Program may be. Different forms of evidence are acceptable in law and in the social sciences beyond the requirements of vidence from the natural sciences but should listening to all proposals about the SSP be included in a discussion within serious institutions like MUFON which (to their merit) takes pride in seeking objective evidence? I think so because the interactive UFO phenomenon includes objective and subjective experiences and interpretations whose claims are always challenging some standardized belief. It is always challenging us to expand our considerations in a rational, critical-but-experiential and intuitive way to eventually be able to “connect the dots” (as my friend Paola Harris might say).

  1. Kenneth Arnold showing a drawing of what he saw. 2. Photo by José María Fernandez Martinez. Guayama,Puerto Rico 1995. 3. 1938 Photo fromPoland (cortesy of Robert Bernatowicz) 4. 1943 Photo from Huanuco, Peru. 5. Depiction of human and non-human “space brothers” from the Nonsiamosoli organization. 5. Drawing of a “Blue Avian” described by Corey Goode due to his involvement with one of the “Secret Space Programs.” 6. Alleged humanoid mummy found in Nazca, Peru. 7. A 1927 UFO photo from Oregon Junction, USA. 8. A variety of other beings described

 

 

 

Star Nations

 

 

As an extraterrestrial experiencer since childhood, this is a challenging blog to write. In fact, I do not want to write it. The question I ask in this blog involves my life journey investigating what happened to me as an ET experiencer. What happened to my friends and colleagues?

Furthermore, I don’t have to write this blog. I have confirmation about much of my ET Experience, which is ongoing. Most of my friends and colleagues have confirmation. There is an ET Presence.

And yet, the mainstream confusing culture chatter of ET remains a constant conundrum.

So, although it would be easier to ignore where my intuition is going—I won’t.

In the end, that’s futile. Questions remain until answered. Here are my question and an attempt at an answer.

Question: What’s Beneath Disclosure: Were We Lab Rats?

Is a vast government-military-intelligence laboratory program that involved citizens of the United States, without their consent, beneath the confusing 70 years of Ufology? 

Are citizens used as subjects in ET UFO scientific field lab experiments to see how we would react to ETs and UFOs? And if so, to what extent are citizens, as unknowing subjects, denied their civil and human rights in this process? Were we, as subjects, fed propaganda and lies and events—some deeply personal—in order to investigate how humans respond to the ET Presence?

My observations lead me to answer, yes. Our government probably experimented with citizens around ETs and UFOs.  And it was a vast multifaceted program.

And all of this is theoretical. I have no FOIA. No Proof. But…. 

CNN.com

CNN.com

Lab Programs for God and Country: When did it happen?

1942: Chemical Warfare Services: Mustard Gas lab experiments

1945 US Atomic Energy Commission: Program F experiments on effects of fluoride

1947: CIA: LSD program experiments

1950: CIA: Project Bluebird experiments in mind control, renamed numerous times

1952 CIA: MK ULTRA, Project Moonstruck experiments in mind control

1958 CIA: Project Dreamland or Orion experiments using drugs, hypnosis, ELF frequencies

That’s a start. A short list of government-military-intelligence lab experiments.

When and where did the Extraterrestrial lab experiments begin? My guess is that the (hypothetical) programs began during the late 40s or 50s. And they continue today.

Who was involved?

Citizens were involved in MILABs—staged ET Experiencer Groups—Abductions—UFO sightings—Film and Television—Books—Conferences—Political Initiatives—Social Media—Blogs. A myriad of communications and structured field lab settings.

What does this mean?

If my theory is correct, then multiple experiments were conducted by government-military-intelligence to research various human reactions to an ET Presence. And those running these programs logged many experiments, many responses, and drew valid conclusions.

I surmise; it went far beyond military abduction, MILAB experiments.

Some of those experiments and conclusions were selected to be made public. They were handed to researchers, film-makers, authors, activists, and Ufology experts—a phone call or dropped document or an off the record conversation.  Then, per the lab plan, these experts communicated the information to the public. Few experts pass on a great story. And few experts knew they were participating in the labs. Need for scientific objectivity determined that participant knowledge might taint the results.

Few experts pass on a great story. And few experts knew they were participating in the labs. Need for scientific objectivity determined that participant knowledge might taint the results.

To be clear, I’m not pointing fingers, except at myself. A vast program left no one in the field of Ufology innocent of involvement.

Continual Confusion

Thus, the confusion started with the labs. From the outset confusion reigned regarding ET.

insidethebrain

insidethebrain

Confusion wasn’t necessarily planned. Or deviously determined. Primarily, confusion was simply the result of multiple experiments with varied conclusions.

If you live in a society where someone uses citizens for a vast array of lab experiments and publicizes select results, then you would create confusion. In order to examine a spectrum of reactions, the citizens would need to encounter a wide range of encounters and stories of ETs.

And all of this is theoretical. I have no FOIA. No Proof. But….

Each experiment, if it was chosen to move into the public media, would be designed to provide a different set of information and possible results (responses).

Many years have passed. Many experiments completed. We know the results. We experienced them all.

We can recite the confusion: good ET, bad ET, kidnapping ET, hungry ET, benevolent ET, recon UFO, attack UFO, peacemaking UFO, and Hollywood ET. Until today, we have the Moon-Mars Secret Space ET.

It’s the Humans, Stupid

The lab studies were not about ET—they were about HUMANS.

In a detailed, careful scientific study each experiment would result in varying information about humans. Not extraterrestrials. Humans.

Decades of field lab experiments would provide data on citizens—humans. The data would be studied and categorized as to how humans reacted to the plethora of information and scenarios about UFOs and ET’s.

Then, the humans’ reactions could be manipulated. Until eventually, the data would show the right formula for disclosure.

Disclosure Formula Done Right

Here is a possible spectrum of reactions to ET: humans either shut down in emotional paralysis and denial, fight back trying to gain information, or flee into utopian communities where they dwell with their spiritual like-minded experiencers. Some simply ignore all the ET shenanigans. Others get high and exaggerate or drug and medicate the experience.

Then there were the specific designer-fashioned ET labs: the data would show some citizens to prefer the blue avian ETs, others the sexy Nordic women, others the terror of the reptilians and others the cute gray cyborg. Pick your ET.

Heck, the psychologists in the lab program probably designed a personality test based on ET Preference.

Pick your ET–It’s your personality. It will premiere on FB after Disclosure. And, it will go viral.

Disclosure: Removing the Truth Embargo

Chances are— if you are an ET Experiencer, have seen a UFO, then you are in a database…somewhere.  And unless there is a Frank Church (there isn’t) then you will never know the extent of the games played at your expense. After all, you are simply a citizen. A subject. Dare I say, a lab rat.

As Hillary and Podesta make promises, as X-Files premieres as soft disclosure—we are drawing closer to the engineered social revelation of the Extraterrestrial Presence.

Trust me; the lab will not do Disclosure until they have the human reaction formula down perfect.

But Wait, Here’s the Rub

Labs create perfect formulas. That is their purpose.

But it is also the rub.

And all of this is theoretical. I have no FOIA. No Proof. But….

There have been numerous labs. And we, as citizens participated in the labs, some of us from the beginning, so we are familiar with all of our responses.

Since we were the subjects of these ongoing experiments, citizen subjects, we know the results of the laboratory experiments we experienced. We know how we reacted. So the information and the roll-out of Disclosure will not come as a surprise. Anyway, Hillary’s promising a task force and starting with Area 51, so we have a bit of time yet.

So, before Presidential Disclosure is official, sit down and list your reactions to every possible experiment you experienced.  Remembered reaction to possible experiments = your map through Official Disclosure.

Peaceful Child Disclosure Has My Money

fractalenlightenment.com

fractalenlightenment.com

My guess is Disclosure will be a designer mixture of the field lab experiments that were most successful in controlling humans. Any fear and anxiety will be calmed by a commander in chief. Mommy or Daddy.

Because our sad truth is that in the view of government-military-intelligence labs, the citizens experimented on are children. Subjects.

I predict a peaceful child disclosure. The Von Braun fireworks of an alien attack will start at a later date. Stay tuned. First the sleep, then the scream. Isn’t that the trauma formula?

Peaceful Child Disclosure=Everything Remains in Place

For now, a peaceful, go along with the program response will be preferred. A peaceful, go along with the program response will guarantee that nothing changes. No principalities or powers will be moved. All will remain intact.

Blind consent accomplishes amazing things for those who engineer our reality.

The Pope, President, the Bankers, Media, the Judges and Titans of Corporations, the Generals and Intelligentsia will remain intact–reposing in a peaceful disclosure, content that the formula worked. The Lab was a success.  All is well in the ET world.

Exoconscious Exceptions

Except, the Exoconscious remember what happened. And, during in the 70-year lab experiment rollout, we matured. We don’t need Mommy or Daddy in the form of a President or an Implant.

lab rat rhymeswithorgage

rhymeswithorange

We are creating new realities, accessing our innate connection and communication with extraterrestrials. Acting on our confirmation of the ET Presence—not man-made artificial confusion.

Our segment of experiment participants plans to move in another direction. We Exoconscious lab rats are awake and we remember who we are. It’s too late, our cage is open. We escaped confusion for certainty. Commotion for Confirmation.

It’s up to us what we make of it. But one thing is certain; we will never be rats again.

 

pic

This film is more about the interviewer, Joe Bilbow, than the interviewee, Neil Gould. Joe Bilbow is Neil Gould’s nephew who is challenged with ADHD and Asbergers Syndrome and under the care and support of the local council.

In this interview it is clear that Joe is exoconscious and more suited to the new and forthcoming cosmic reality, a stark contrast to the mundane and depressing skewered world around him which he rejects and challenges for all the right exopolitical reasons.

Joe tackled the exopolitical questions in great depth challenging his uncle, covering the ET issue; abductions, super technology, disclosure, holographic universe and religion. His challenged mindset leads the interview into areas, which include ADHD cosmic awareness that the very people who support him, are unable to even perceive.

Well done Joe Bilbow, you are truly out there!

 

 

  • 1
  • 2
  • 6

Copyright © 2017 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.