Author: Giorgio Piacenza

After a clear UFO sighting with multiple witnesses within 300 feet in the Peruvian coastal town of "Chilca" in 1975, I participated with the Mission Rahma contact group and befriended several contactees from this and other contact efforts. I also researched many aspects of the UFO phenomenon for several decades and feel inclined to contribute in the confluence of philosophical and scientific perspectives.
"This UFO-shaped Adinkra drawn by Landweber is a graphic representation of a binary error-correcting program found in the laws of physics in relation to Superstring Theory. Physicist James Gates discovered this pattern and may show that our universe is programed and even possessing error-correcting codes

Ethics of Transdimensional Extraterrestrials

Pin It

By Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera

 "This UFO-shaped Adinkra drawn by Landweber is a graphic representation of a binary error-correcting program found in the laws of physics in relation to Superstring Theory. Physicist James Gates discovered this pattern and may show that our universe is programed and even possessing error-correcting codes
Is this a sign that transdimensional information controls reality? This UFO-shaped “Adinkra” (drawn by Landweber) represents a binary, error-correcting program discovered by Superstring & Supersymmetry physicist Sylvester James Gates.

I think that -upon coming in contact with our particular physical reality- extraterrestrials equally acquire internal limitations in relation to each other and to us and must therefore follow a careful kind of engagement with Humanity and this would impinge upon what we would consider their “ethics.” Many of us have asked are extraterrestrials “benevolent” or “malevolent”?  Are some “benevolent” and some “malevolent” or are we only imposing our human standards onto them? Opinions are heated and there might be good reasons for any of those evaluations while -typically-  we might be emotionally attached to any of these. However, I think that the issue needs to be more intelligently considered and we might make progress.  The simple answer might be “both” and “neither” but let me start from the beginning.

“False Flag,” human-created, ET invasions would be events which cater to a primitive –or rather naïve- way of experiencing the world, one dependent upon external, physical manipulation. If the “container” or “conveyor” of physical experiences itself (what we currently call “space-time”) can be modified, the relational situation among ETS with this capability would not be what we normally expect. An “either-or” issue is normally more limited to a mechanistic, classical science. According to my ongoing research on the origins of physical reality, modifying physical space-time first requires connecting more intensely with specific patterns in the metaphysically prior “Astral” “Subtle” or Mental” Realm…a realm (unlike the physical universe we are more consciously aware of) of immediate, interior, subjective expression; a realm in which mental objects manifest in the exterior or shared experiential “space” “after” the primacy of interior, subjective insights.  While “time” in a physical universe can be primarily understood as allowing distinct, sequential, experiences or intuitive apprehensions (in Whitehead’s sense), “time” in the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm can be understood as allowing exterior experiential objects to coincide with interior-subjective insights in any order suitable to that interiority. In both cases “time” allows distinctions to be made as perfect experiential unity is neither of the Physical nor of the Astral-Subtle-Mental realms. While in the Physical Realm (composed of conceivable and possible physical universes) exterior objects limit experiential insights within an exterior order in the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm exterior objects would accommodate or directly respond to insights. The degree of denial of the latter would determine how “physical” a universe is.

If there’s any truth in relation to any fundamental shift being introduced by a pre-quantum realm “code” or “signal” stemming from the center of our galaxy in December 21st, 2012, it may have to do with a Astral-Subtle-Mental reprogramming of patterns that affect what is possible in our experience of the physical universe. For us the change might occur gradually rather than in a “quantum leap” kind of way and it might just manifest as an increased way in which our physical reality might be able to interact with the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm and with subtler physical universes. Connections will probably naturally open with physical universes whose systemic components resonate with precisely defined greater or more inclusive degrees of interaction with the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm. According to some contactees from the Mission Rahma group, this recoding of fundamental Subtle Realm patterns affecting “our” physical universe might affect extraterrestrials more immediately and intensely than what we’ll experience.

I think that physical universes are specifically regulated and depend (for their specific fundamental values and degree of macro-experiential separation from their own negentropy (or degree of synergistic causality obtained from combining with its own negentropic states) upon specific limitations imposed upon the more fundamental Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm whose shared experiential “spaces” or exteriors respond to the mind without the experiential limitations or “dimensions” which we call “duration” or “distance.” The amount of asymmetry introduced to that Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm is concomitant to how “physical” and limited to inertia, entropy, experiential delay and separate objective causes-effect relations a particular physical universe is. This asymmetry would also separate the macro-scale, entropic, time-forward causality we are ordinarily conscious of, from the micro-scale, negentropic, probably associated retro causality we are ordinarily unaware of or tend to occasionally perceive in a subconscious, dream-like, precognitive or altered state.  Nevertheless, both causalities seem to remain symmetrical at the quantum relativistically-invariant level of unobserved events as suggested by the Klein-Gordon Equation. That our universe might be designed, specified and “programmed” might be reflected in the “Adinkras” drawn by Gregory D. Landweber which (according to superstring physicist Silvester James Gates) apparently represent error-correcting, binary programs accompanying the physical laws of our physical universe.

Being able to reconnect both complementary causal and retrocausal, time-forward and time-backward probably but (in so far as they coincide, “actual” or “real”) physical spaces would “increase the gauge symmetry” (as Dr. William A. Tiller might say) and would require (as Dr. William A. Tiller might also say) an intervention from the subjacent Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm common to both and whose “intervention capability” or what would correspond to Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm “quanta of action” might operate both at speeds below C and above C (the speed of light in the vacuum). In fact, particular subsets of that metaphysically prior realm of physical consequence may be stably interactive with the “akashic” vacuum plenum that may sustain all realm levels and qualitatively different kinds of realities thus also sustaining our specific physical universe.

I think that would matter most to adavanced ET beings would be the ability to experience while structuring information knowing quite well that all levels of the Cosmos are defined but interactive, pliable and ultimately not “Real.”Being able to manipulate the possibilities of EXPERIENCE and the INFORMATION which structures experiential objects by manipulating what we call “dimensions,” “space” and “time,” impinges upon the “rules of collective engagement” among different “transdimensional” ET species. This makes these “rules” more sophisticated than what we normally think as most of us in this physical Earth are still limited to a parochial, animalistic (predator-prey effective) sense of macro-level, material “reality.” In this way of experiencing “reality” exterior physical actions dominate and we are instinctively used to “dangers” coming from the outside. Nevertheless, trying to impose one’s will or to satisfy one’s species’ needs primarily through physically external actions and technologies would make no sense if the manipulation of EXPERIENCE and of object-structuring INFORMATION depends upon the sensitive issue of shared inner “spaces.” These are relational “spaces” and relational “spaces” cannot be ignored to sustain a subjective sense of being and technological advancement would force a deeper kind of relational “space.” Upon entering our physical world the extraterrestrial inner relational spaces would be compromised. Thus, agreements among transdimensional ET species would have to take this into account as shared inner “spaces” have to be respected. Another way to say it is that, in order to interact with our physical reality, the ETS “imaginal” worlds (in the Jungian sense) would be compromised. These worlds are Astral-Subtle-Mental but do generate physical effects and would generate physical effects in the particular physical universe they come from. Thus, having to share aspects of their “imaginal worlds” in order to interact with our particular physical reality would imperil the realm where their subjective experiences (most intimately linked to their sense of being) unfold. Their first person, subjective experiences inevitably linked to a shared, second person “we-generating” relational Astral-Subtle-Mental “space”  in turn linked to the production of the particular physical reality they want to interact with would be affected if they intervened too aggressively or distorted how we perceive and experience our physical reality.

It is not a simple as saying that we are imposing our “good and evil” prejudices and dichotomies upon “them” or as saying that all of them have a benevolent intention because they have overcome dichotomous thinking. Generally speaking, “they” may have different histories, inclinations, needs motivations and agendas but their interaction with our physical reality would open them to certain perils. Through acquiring Earth human Astral-Subtle-Mental patterns, the way “they” experience their agentic or volitional selves in their stable physical universe might acquire characteristics related to a distortion imposed on us. Expression vehicles internal to their agentic or volitional selves could be altered. The different sets of engagement ethics with physical Earth humans could be primarily contrived and rationally-objectively accepted or primarily adopted from a willing and subjective initiative.  The former would be like a rational, objective, “third person,” practical “gentlemen’s agreement” so as not to imperil Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm experiential vehicles mutually internal to all ET species involved (when interacting with the particular physical universe in which our Earth humanity manifests. The latter would be like a more synergistic, spontaneous, “first person” subjectively-initiated desire to enhance the lives of all entities involved in these multiple reality interphases. In either case, we would not see external, overt invasion tactics as most “False Flag” ET invasion scenarios would apparently simulate. The demands of a higher realm “subtlety”, so to speak, would impose similar complications on all extraterrestrial participants.

Being able to manipulate the same space-time while sharing the same Astral-Subtle-Mental  experiential “space” would change the “ball game” as few ET civilizations would risk disarraying their internal Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm order with which their people experience their unique interpretive sense of reality. Thus, there would be a mechanism in place to deter or intercept the few “rogue” transdimensionally-capable ETS not playing by the rules. The same mechanism would force ET entities with different needs, motivations and agendas to respect each other and not to intervene beyond what is minimally required. Those not willing to maintain the general agreed-upon safety of all ET civilizations with a stake on humanity and physical Earth would be sifted out.

The degree of reconnection (or of mutually canceling) of the causal and retrocausal or of the primarily entropic and negentropic complementary physical aspects that originally spring from the (duration cero and distance cero) mental object-manifesting objective exteriors corresponding to the  Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm would generate various degrees of more or less “ethereal” and more or less “dense” physical universes. Some of these universes would allegedly be the ones from which many ET species originate. They would still be “physical” as their intuitive experiential grasp would follow from exterior objects (however syntropic and synchronistic that experience might be). When the mutual cancellation of the causal and retrocausal “split” is complete, we would not be speaking of “physical universes” any longer as experience would not manifest through the use of exterior objects interacting under the “dimensions” of distance and delay.

The subsets of the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm components of visiting extraterrestrials (subsets impinging upon their own physical realities and timelines) become shared internal components with us when they shift their vibratory states in order to resonate and relate with our physical universe. This means that the Astral-Subtle-Mental a previous potential agentic or volitionally active aspect of their selves becomes actual or active and coincidental with ours. Again, these subsets (required to relate with our physical universe) would become “actual” from a previous (non-interactive) “potential” state and, as being components that manifest our physical universe now coincide with their own actual and agentic interior experiences. These Astral-Subtle-Mental subsets of extraterrestrial physical universes that would now coincide with the same Astral-Subtle-Mental subsets that generate our particular physical universe and kind of experiences would also become common to all the ET species physically interacting with us. In other words, the patterns would be incorporated and would become internal or free-will responding to their own agency, to our agency and to the agency of any being interacting with our physical universe and timeline. This would not just impose responsibilities but also restrictions and inherent safeguards.

Pin It

The BREDAM: An Extraterrestrial Ethical Understanding

By Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera

An alleged multidimensional doorway “Xendra” photographed in Uruguay

Harmonious universal values and principles become personally binding and not just “lofty words” disconnected from “reality” and soon to be forgotten if our sense of belonging, our self-identity expands beyond irrational, pre-integral exclusivisms. After years of reviewing contactee literature I’d say that many alleged extraterrestrials seem to have an expanded sense of belonging, not only in a cognitive sense and in ways of dealing with complexity and multidimensionality but also in heart-felt, spiritual and instinctive a-rational (not irrational) terms. These types of ETS seem to be more human-compatible and to offer the most human-enhancing and whole free will-respecting contacts. Can we rise to the challenge and get a grip of their ethics as exopolitical ambassadors and as humans in general?

There’s an ethical understanding called the “Bredam.” “The ‘Bredam’ or ‘Cosmic Song of the Universe’ is not found in any particular place but is everywhere at once. It is not written in any language, books, manuscripts or codes. Its place and expectation is from always. There is no secret to find it because as it is it is without you. It is a perennial energy and all have access to it when the time arrives (an alleged ET transmission to a contactee within Mission Rahma).”

Within the (international but mostly Latin American) ET contact group called “Mission Rahma” (originated in 1973-74 by Sixto Paz Wells, his family and friends inside the Peruvian Institute of Interplanetary Relations “IPRI” founded by his father Carlos Paz García in 1955), the “Bredam” is alleged to be a moral understanding and a set of “laws” adhered to in every planetary civilization that functions under the spiritual authority of the 24 Elders of the (Milky Way) Galaxy. The following extract is a conceptual transmission which allegedly took place during a contact experience in which a physical and inter-dimensional transference to “Morlen” (Ganymede) was achieved through an artificially generated dimensional gateway called “Xendra.” I translated the following passage inspired on the “Bredam” from

“One can only see well with the heart

One can only identify correctly with intuition

One can only understand well with respect to reasons

One can only judge well with an understanding of motivations

One can only dialogue adequately with tolerance to diverse opinions but,

above all, one can only teach well through example.”

“Mission Rahma” is one of several contact missions with specific varieties of our extraterrestrial forefathers. These particular “forefathers” admit that in the past they committed several mistakes that hurt humanity. Nonetheless, they currently seem to be aligned with the love-based esoteric teachings of the world religions and to be very respectful of Master Jesus the Christ in particular because this being is one with the “Cosmic Christ” or Logos. The latter element seems to be a reason why they found a more receptive human community among Spanish-speaking spiritual seekers. In the word “Rahma” “Ra” symbolizes the “Sun” and “divine light.” “Ma” symbolizes “the Earth” and the letter “h” symbolizes our “humanity” capable of bringing light and wisdom to Earth but also to the Cosmos and, furthermore, of acting as a “bridge” to the highest dimensions of existence which extraterrestrials themselves do not reach. Even if the group is numerically small (perhaps in the thousands over the years in more than 20 countries), the unity of altruistic purpose and collective spiritual “work” is deemed an effective representation in the name of humanity.

Allegedly, according to physical contactees from this group, Ganymede (the moon of Jupiter) harbors a technologically-sustained intentional community (a multi-faceted colony of colonists from many civilizations which did not adhere to the Orion rebellion). The colony (called “Morlen”) is thought to be located in another time frame and vibratory level of physical reality. It is also considered to be the local seat of the “Council of the 24 Elders of the (Milky Way) Galaxy.”

While I’m quoting ideas expressive of the “Bredam,” this “code” is more like the “spirit of the law” thought to be felt and understood by the spiritual heart and through common sense. Some of the sayings that follow (allegedly communicated by extraterrestrial “guides” and by some of their spiritual “masters” during telepathic transmissions) may give us a better sense of this unwritten “code”:

Close your eyes to see; Open your heart to understand; Seal your lips to vibrate; Feel the Christ presence to shine.

The beginning of reason is logic and the logic of its beginning is its end. Reason doesn’t rest in knowledge but in wisdom.

The goal of a wise master is not that his disciple equals him but to be surpassed by him; in this way he will have an opportunity to become a disciple once again.

What you understand with the heart is integrated with the mind and is communicated with the sublime act of love.


These guidelies were extensively used within the Mission Rahma contacty groups. Ideally, the guidelines which serve to judge the truthfulness and positive contributions of an extraterrestrial message could also give us some hints on the “Bredam” that inspires whom we would call “benign” or “life-enhancing,” “freedom-respectful” extraterrestrials: 1) A genuine life-enhancing message is coherent and logical. 2) It possesses a simple and profound wisdom. 3) It is positive and provides options, never falling prey to catastrophism. 4) It always provides something new and isn’t simply the repetition of previous messages, nor does it contradict them but it expands and deepens upon them. 5) It is outside of time: Its knowledge transcends time. 6) It brings an intuitively perceived subtle contribution which quite often reason cannot understand. It is a sense of light and spirituality which is felt upon relating with the message. 7) A genuine message is universal and not personal or exclusive. It doesn’t over-differentiate. 8) It can propose specific spiritual tasks or a change for the good but never impose them on others.

Reflections: Is a Cosmic/Universal Ethics Humanly Possible?

Reflecting on what causes self-reflective, intelligent beings to behave for the benefit of others I realize that a most crucial ingredient is the shared values of the group we participate with in a vital or personally important way. If our self-identity depends on valuing being men and our group implicitly says “men are tough” we’ll try to show toughness. If we are Americans and our self-identity depends on groups that implicitly say that “Americans are predestined by God” we’ll support that. Every value we support, if it is partially true will not just negate its opposite. It will support our core sense of self identifications and also leave out other partially true values. Nevertheless, the more UNIVERSAL and INCLUSIVE our sense of self and group-related values are the more these values will partially coincide with other people’s. It may be a matter of gradually expanding one’s inclusivity along with what values can our sense of identity coexist with.

Can we expect ETS to risk openly contacting us in our own terms any time soon? Can we live by a universal and unspecified ethics like the “Bredam?” Can we listen and resonate with the “Song of the Universe?” I think that we already do it to a greater or lesser extent in so far as we value others besides ourselves to whichever degree. Nonetheless, I also think that that to do so in a similar way as the alleged extraterrestrials mentioned in this essay more importantly requires an expansion or leap in the spiritually (Monad presence) “heart-felt” and constitutionally (gross and subtle bodies integration) “instinctively-felt” self-identity. These are the spiritual and the fundamental sides of our conscious capacity to include. Secondarily it requires a cognitive expansion into a trans-systemic, integral-level understanding. In other words, cognition and mental understanding may be necessary and useful but not as fundamentally important as spiritually-inspired feeling and struturally-inspired instinct. This may be why benign extraterrestrials often choose not just people who don’t have a personal stake in institutions but also who are not very intellectually inclined. Their good feelings and good instincts about their contacts is in these cases what matters most.

While cognitive expansion of our conscious “space” would deal with extraterrestrials (and any other form of life) in depersonalized, Third Person-objective, inter-systemic ways (like a “Vulcan” from the TV series “Star Trek” would) spiritual and instinctive conscious expansion would deal with extraterrestrials in personal, First Person-subjective ways. Both ways could be necessary but the latter would be more fundamental since even subjectivity may be ultimately linked to the Universal Conscious Presence that gives rise to everything, including objects and the intelligence needed to understand them.

Perhaps a basic “gentlemen’s agreement” kind or respect in our relations with ETS may require our self-identities to embrace a healthy cognitive respect for the vital integration of all systems (terrestrial and extraterrestrial) but a kind and superior alignment with the highest good for everyone in the long run may require a self-identity extended by an opening of the heart.

Contactees within Mission Rahma (as well as contactees from other groups, theosophists, new agers and channelers) have generally privileged the former kind of leap and within Mission Rahma it has been called a leap into the “Fourth Dimension of Consciousness.” Nonetheless, this expansion or “leap in consciousness” might also correlate with the research and theories put forth in the work of several coinciding developmental psychologists like Dr. Clare W. Graves’ and his “Levels of Existence” (, Dr. Elizabeth Cook-Greuter and her “Action Logics,” Dr. Jane Loevinger’s and her “Stages of Ego Development” ( and Harvard Professor in Adult Learning and Professional Behavior Dr. Robert Kegan’s and his “Orders of Consciousness” ( In relation to a cognitive and self-identity level of awareness capable of dealing with the world as a whole (and in my view even perhaps) with extraterrestrial contact Professor Kegan refers to the possibility of an emerging “Inter-Individual Order of Consciousness.” At least all of these researchers using different kinds of structuralist methods through psychological tests and other objective ways of quantifying human psychological development coincide with one of the fathers of Humanistic psychology, Dr. Abraham Maslow ( who thought that higher stages of human development were indeed possible.

I think that each particular group of self-aware and self-reflective beings on Earth (and elsewhere) admit values which are degrees of understandings which ultimately derive from the original explicated Source, the sound and light of all creation, universes, densities and materiality. As that which provides essential meaning, coherence and order it has been variously recognized in different religions as: All inclusive love, the Logos/Christ, the Word, AUM, the compassionate Buddha Mind, and even as by esoteric mystics as a vibratory essence of MIND behind the seven Hermetic principles given in “The Kybalion.” The human sense of order, of right and wrong, of better and worse, of more or less harmonious, of what to include or to exclude so as to choose and evolve would emerge from this original vibration at the Heart of all that manifests. The ability to recognize it would always be with us (however we may have been genetically modified for the worse) because without it living systems would not flourish. It would be naturally encoded within our bodies and our DNA blueprint. If we feel it as a single thread connecting our body, mind and spirit essences and their corresponding “bodies” we are potentially capable of acting more inclusively and kindly to all of life, extending our vital (and absolutely necessary) sense of belonging and participation to the entire Cosmos.


Atkinson, William W. & Philip Deslippe (edit) (1908/2011). The Kybalion. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin: Los Angeles.

Contacto Rahma Blogspot

El Bredam: Código Moral Cósmico

González, Ricardo. (2007). El Decadrón. Proyecto ECIS Publicaciones: Buenos Aires.

Kegan, Robert (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

Misión Rahma New York Blogspot

Paz Wells, Sixto. (2000). The Invitation. 1st World Library: Fairfield.

Unidos en el Contacto

How to Think about UFO-ET Contacts: Complexity is Here to Stay

By Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera

Image Source: The Daily Galaxy blog

HELLO EXOPOLITICIANS! I agree with our great colleague Paola L. Harris that, unless more valiant politicians and exopoliticians (like the Honorable Hellyer) with evidence about the UFO/visitors reality are willing to come “out of the closet”, the “silence of the unwilling” will drown once again the valiant voices. I also concur that bringing up contactee experiences tends to make disclosure efforts less credible but, for me, the main issue is that the main blockage appears to arise from limiting human attitudes.  It is in us and awareness could perhaps liberate us as well. I think that there still are great opportunities through contactees (in spite of uncritical, non-analytical, “true believer” tendencies perhaps in most who also tend not to be in positions of respectable public power).

Contactees are also important, not just because of their candidness which can give us a gentler sense of the reality behind some of the contacts but because they can help us to re-connect with aspects of ourselves based on inherent goodness. Just as we may think that some of the “visitors” have “good reasons” why they are conducting abduction procedures (for our own good) (always?) we can think that they have “good reasons” why other prefer to contact nonacademic, non-powerful, non-analytical people that will often develop a “true believer,” missionary attitude. Perhaps this is a way to gently reach an average level of awareness in humanity allowing room to accept or not to accept that contacts are taking place.

We must understand that contactee, abductee, integrated contactee-abductee, accidental, channeling, historical and research ufological literature shows ever-increasing evidence there are varieties of ETS (not just Annunakis; not just lizards attempting to control us or greys with a variety of agendas, needs, agreements, timeline degrees of evolution; not just human-like benevolent space brothers and human-like and non-human-like negative Orions; not just future Essasani, art-loving Pleiadians, trans-dimensional Venusians, matter-of-fact scientists, inhabitants of Ganymede, semi-angelic beings and giants from Lyra ). The range is HUGE and we should neither fall in fear and disrepair nor ignore that -during some contacts- warnings about deceiving entities were also received. We are the ones that place limits.

Moreover, to understand how to think of “them” as “good or evil” and, simultaneously, not as “good or evil” we need to complexify our thinking. For instance, it’s not just that “if they were violent they would have conquered or wiped us out a long time ago.” If there are many groups of ETS with different agendas, needs and levels of development, there may be a control mechanism as to who is allowed to interact with us or not. There might be hierarchies between those that have transcended certain needs and those that have not. These hierarchies might not even be understood as between those ETS that are older or from particular far-flung futures (and thus more evolved) and those newer or closer to our present in terms of experience. We need to complexify our thinking in order to reach beyond the “adolescent stage” some of us may be in right now. We need to think in terms of Meta patterns reflecting a cosmic-level culture.

As researchers (and as non-integral humans in general) we tend to choose the aspect of Ufology that resonates more with us. This is a big problem. This is THE problem when facing a complex issue such as learning how to live in today’s world or learning how to relate with the ET presence. If we cannot handle a radical shift in our sense of reality and self-identity we (humans in general and not just researchers) will debunk even bona fide cases without learning from them or taking our time to carefully…research. Col. Corso’s case is a “case in point” as some researchers that contribute with other findings also invalidate this case…perhaps “unfairly.” This self-limiting attitude not only applies to government witnesses but to abductees, contactees, free energy researchers, and even amongst members of the UFO/ET research community. In fact, it applies to humanity in general as it stands now. As I’ll soon explain, we tend to invalidate each other too much, jumping onto the dissimilarities first rather than onto the similarities because our self-identities are limited because our three-vehicle instincts are disconnected.

There’s always someone with a great “piece of the puzzle” whose information we don’t FEEL as complementary but as dangerous to us. It is an irrational but effective attitude that which controls us in everything political we do. I think that we have three main types of instincts giving us a sense of exterior danger or of interior safety and that these instincts originate in our three main spiritual vehicles: The Physical, the Subtle and the Causal.  Each instinct is an adaptation to a primary cosmic environment reflecting the Body, Mind and Spirit aspects of being. This three-tiered partition of the Cosmos is present in many mystical-experiential disclosures such as in the philosophy of Vedanta. It behooves researchers to discover this.

If the instinct that controls us the most is physical we may always sense that what is most “real” is external stuff and think that the crux of ET interaction is in terms of technology, winning-losing, genetics and object manipulation and control. For this matter, benevolent contactee stories transmitting platitudes instead of technologies, or stories representing philosophical-humane understandings rather than, for instance, no-nonsense, physically manipulative genetic abductions, would also typically (and irrationally) feel to be much more “ludicrous” to most who think of themselves as “serious, objective researchers.” Then again, those that naturally sense a preponderance of instincts associated with the Subtle or the Causal spiritual vehicles may over-value inspiring platitudes. Enslaved by their preferred, non-integrated “instinct” researchers (and people in general attracted to the UFO-ET field) would focus on the mistakes of people whose main message represents other non-personally integrated instincts thus selecting out and dismissing parts of the genuine. Contactee reports and evidence (and along with that the invitations of ET groups willing to communicate more openly) are often summarily dismissed as genuine witnesses (however “credible,” “accredited” or not) they may be. They are simply non-instinctively detected. This happens irrationally if our “core sense of identity” and the “pieces of the puzzle” we hold on to EXCLUSIVISTICALLY (our personal “facts”) are challenged. The big problem we may not even be aware of is the non-integration of our three main instincts. When ideas and personal sense-making realizations reflect an imbalance between our three main instincts we violently sustain an incomplete self-sense boundary even to the point of endangering ourselves to sustain that boundary.

If we feel that (simplifying the situation) physically intervening ETS are more “real” that counsel-giving ETS we may ultimately prefer to contact the former than the latter. Still, I’d say that, between having a voluntary contact with more apparently communicative beings after a respectful invitation and exposing ourselves (however open-mindedly influenced by our current, cultural stage of post-modern relativism we may be) to anyone that comes along or to potentially abducting beings who (reasonably speaking, may or may not do it for ‘our own good’) and who may or may not be associated with “evil” controllers (we don’t really know if the word “evil” should be thrown out of our lexicon according to a universal ethics or to our religious ethics/biases normally decried as mistaken, limited and intolerant), it’s for me a ‘hands down’ choice for the first option. I think we can still gain much understanding and growth from ETS who are giving us opportunities to interact in a mutually respectful, friendly and kind way. By God, if there are opportunities to make an appointment for communicative contact with apparently kinder ETS why are we broadly preferring to hold on to a chance for contact through abducting ETS? Why do we hold on to a third person (often mutually undermining) research approach “after the facts” instead of finding out directly for ourselves? Why don’t we see past their pseudo-religious mistakes and attempt direct contact right away?

I think that, just as there was inhumane abusive intolerance in socially organized expressions of religious dogmatism in pre-modern religious and in biased-rational-modern (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, right wing or left wing) absolutistic eras, we can also be blinded by the “relativism” of the current, more culturally advanced, post-modern era and ethos. BOTH the pre post-modern and the post-modern ideological positions are exclusivist and reductionist. The latter one is more difficult to detect but is radically flattening of differences and of a positive sense of hierarchy which, (according to integral and complexity thinkers) are natural facts of all forms of organization, regardless of level of development.

I think that, to start relating more intelligently with cosmic ‘cultures’ (culturally situated at least a couple of ‘notches’ beyond us) we need to develop our identities, ways of thinking, not just past the bigotry of pre-modern and modern but also past the post-modern ethos. Those of us willing to promote or lead toward a form of disclosure or to personally establish direct contact with ETS should conceptually and identitarily grow past post-modern (even if the self-identity of most people in the world seems still attached to pre-modern and modern ethos!): We must perceive more than equally valid, “horizontal” patterns; we must get a sense of the pattern that relates patterns. We must learn to think and to feel not only “systemically” (as in postmodernity) but “trans-systemically” the pattern behind patterned levels of complexity. Moving forward in “exopolitics” is not just about having pre-modern, clear-cut values; about modern-rational, effective pragmatism; about infinite egalitarian tolerance or about holistically including the best of all previous characteristics. It is about acquiring a non-monological initial degree of “cosmic understanding” (cosmic understanding “101”), the ABC’s of a common cosmic language (of the whole and the part) allowing us to share understandings to communicate with all varieties of “cosmic-faring” ETS more intelligently. Perhaps these ETS (regardless of their particular distinctions and inclinations are capable of simultaneously integrating exclusivist, relational and transcendental logics simultaneously.


Copyright © 2018 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.