Author: Giorgio Piacenza

After a clear UFO sighting with multiple witnesses within 300 feet in the Peruvian coastal town of "Chilca" in 1975, I participated with the Mission Rahma contact group and befriended several contactees from this and other contact efforts. I also researched many aspects of the UFO phenomenon for several decades and feel inclined to contribute in the confluence of philosophical and scientific perspectives.

A Mayan Long Count Calendar ends in 2012

Pin It

Perhaps the Mission Rahma Contact Experience Offers Snippets of What Might be Going On

By Giorgio Piacenza

Many interesting themes were covered in an interview made to Richard Hoagland by the dedicated, independent exopolitical research journalist Paola Leopizzi Harris (click here for list of interviews) go to: However, most people (and Richard seems to be one of them) still hold on to the notion that there’s an end to ‘THE’ (one and only) Long Count Mayan Calendar, an event expected to occur (if calculations are true and accurate as most scholars think they are) in Dec 21st 2012. This prompts me to the following commentary. Not long ago, another “long count” version (extending perhaps another 7000 years into the future) was found in Xultún, Guatemala, by a bona fide archeological team from Boston University led by William A. Saturno.

We have to know that when we speak of “December 21st 2012,” we refer to what was found in the Dresden Codex’s version of the Mayan Long Count but it is likely that other calendar lengths were devised and interpreted in different Mayan cities like as the XULTÚN finding suggests. This has to be taken into account in any serious reckoning of what may be going on and in any future concomitant research.

If the (however “advanced,” also warrior-like and quite bloody) Mayans were indeed advanced seers into aspects of nature more fundamental than those normally explored by modern science, one or more “longer counts” may have other such fundamental meanings not currently explored by UFO-New Age-Exopolitics receptive communities. I wonder what would have happened if news of the lengthier long count found in Xultún had reached the intellectual leaders (like Terence McKenna and John Major Jenkins) of those open-minded, alternative communities twenty years ago. Regardless, it might still be that those authors may at least be partially right and that the 2012 particular alignment: Including the Earth-Sun-Dark Rift-and (from an angle above the level of the plane of the galaxy) somewhere towards the Center of the Milky Way Galaxy (considered its center of rotation) may be quite important after all (even if the 1998 alignment is considered to have been astronomically more precise). However, I think that any normal physical forces (like gravity from the galaxy’s main black hole) or gamma and x-ray radiation are not likely to affect us because of their weakness due to (an approximate 26,000 light year) distance.

Again, we have to be clear that neither our planet nor our Sun will be going through the Galactic Plane (sometimes also called the “Galactic Equator” for convenience). We are currently located several degrees to the north or “above” this “Galactic Plane” and about 27 parsecs distant from it. As we are currently cycling up and away from this plane, it will take millions of years to pass once again through it. In fact what we should be talking about is of an approximate alignment with some important place in the actual center of the galaxy or somewhere in the vicinity of the center of the galaxy.

Not only is this alignment from an angle “above” but the same overall positioning (with moderate differences) occurs every 21st of December (with the Sun between the approximate center of the galaxy and the Earth). In fact the same alignment (but with the Earth opposite to the Sun in relation to it) occurs during June 20th. In both cases we experience a “SOLSTICE” which in Latin basically means “stationary Sun” since during those days there’s a moment in which the Sun seems to stop before reversing the horizontal component of its sunrise-sunset path across the sky. This moment in which the Sun STOPS was perhaps regarded by several ancient cultures as a special moment in which an important aspect of the sense of movement or “TIME” also “froze.” In a sense, it might also be considered a “moment out of time” and this will also be a factor to consider on December 21st, 2012.

In all these observations I think that we must consider that the “alignment” with the estimated rotational center of the Milky Way Galaxy on the December 21st, 2012 date will not be exact but off by about 6 degrees, 38 minutes.

We may also have to distinguish whether we expect any signal, radiation, force, information pulse or an anomaly to stem from the approximate rotational center of the galaxy, from where the great black hole near the galactic center looms or perhaps from the so-called “Great Central Sun of the Galaxy” which is recognized by some esoteric traditions following guidance from Alice Bailey’s neo theosophical tradition. In fact, I don’t discard the possibility that an alignment with a source of internally codifying information akin to the alleged (and apparently still undiscovered) “Great Central Sun of the Galaxy” might be where our Earth could align with in December 21st, 2012.

Regardless, the year 2012 might be different. Some contactee friends of mine (Ricardo Gonzalez from Perú and Luis Fernando Mostajo from Bolivia, friends whom I consider responsible, level-headed and genuine) seem to have been basically told that this year’s alignment signals the POINT OF NO RETURN TOWARD A GRADUAL BUT FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT. According to them, our “reality” may begin reconnecting with the time frequency of another and more original physical universe from which our known physical universe derives. I think that, if there’s any truth to any of this (something which I think is quite possible, even while trying not to fall into a fanatical, absolutist or “true believer” mindset) in any one particular interpretation of a contact experience), there might be a subquantum, re-codifying, information signal stemming from the center of the galaxy, a signal connecting with our sun, the Earth-Moon system and us non-locally. The work of Nicolai A. Kozyrev in “torsion physics,” of physicist Claude Swanson, PhD and his hypothetical sub-quantum “phitons” and that of Basil Hiley on David Bohm’s “Quantum Potential” being like an “active information potential” in “pre space” comes to mind. There may be geometric cycles in “pre-space” through which other forms of subtler physical energy-information patterns could flow. In fact, this “pre-space” may be more like a reciprocal “time-frequency domain” as proposed by Professor William A. Tiller, PhD or like what could be called (according to David Wilcock in The Source Field Investigations) a “reciprocal Time-Space” as proposed Dewey Larson’s “Reciprocal System Theory.” In my view, greater evidence for this complementary/reciprocal level of physical reality will accrue and scientists may also soon discover that this level constitutes a link with a non-physical, information-cohering Subtle-Mental Realm from which physical universes derive.

At any rate, there’s no need for a straightforward “end of the world” and there’s no clearly distinguishable “end of the world” Mayan prophecy as in the apocalyptic Christian sense which is culturally projected as a stable expectation by some people exploring alternative visions of reality. I also think most Mayans nowadays are not excessively worried about the “crucial date.” Many expectations of fast, radical shifts within UFO-ET receptive communities have normally ended up in disappointment, hiding failure “under the rug” and-or in re-directing the expectations. Books like When Prophecy Fails (by L. Festinger) and When Prophecy Never Fails (by D. Tumminia) illustrate some of this recurring situation. There either are social pressures for creating self-deceit and for holding on to a mythic story line structure (on which the sense of personal identity in an emotionally bound group depends) or, perhaps, the interactive nature of contact with different Time frequencies (and perhaps more intense) physical energies cannot be easily interpreted from our regular embodied experience in our particular Time frame and extra interpretive efforts must arise in the personal and the collective unconscious. Perhaps both factors are inextricably linked if contact with higher/subtler physical universes not directly (but perhaps subconsciously) correlated with our subjective experiences force us to experience a mismatch.

Nevertheless, according to both of my friend’s accounts (their contact experiences occurred in separate physical locations), this Dec 21, 2012 event might actually be the beginning of the end of a way to live in “Time” and-or to experience “Time.” How this may arise could be gradual but unexpected and it might include new scientific discoveries on the importance of underlying “coherent information” as the basis sustaining our universe. It might also include an increase interactive awareness with other realms and universes. I speculate like this because of being acquainted with the -by and large- emotionally calm and socially healthy participants in the Mission Rahma, predominantly Latin American contact groups supporting the more intense contact experiences of these and other friends since 1973-74. Such groups are probably part of a more effective interpretive support system promoting more level-headed and interpretively clearer contacts with beings whom –even if friendly and proven as thoroughly respectful over time- may be easily misunderstood because of primarily moving in other Time frequencies under differently cohering and –quite likely- more intense energies.

Interestingly, when in the 1970’s the interactive contact events were more intense and felt like “recent news” the various Mission Rahma contact-experiencing individuals and support groups also tended to interpret ET messages more dramatically and with a greater sense of urgency. Their counter balancing group support (along with well-established, culturally-cohesive patterns) was small and the charismatic leadership of the main contactees (mostly the Paz Wells brothers) was much more influential. Enthusiasm reigned and they also experienced a greater degree of radicalism as might be expected from other contact groups in similar situations. In this stage dominated by strong personalities manifesting “party lines” and followership many mistakes were committed. Nevertheless, intense (physical and otherwise) contact experiences were not (purposefully or otherwise) limited to the main group leaders and, in time, other important contactees came to the fore. In spite of the non-intellectual/non-skeptically analytical but, instead, rather idealistic nature of most (even if well-intended) participants throughout the years, other forms of decency and reasonableness apparently elicited through harmonizing group processes served to gradually hone or perfect interpretive skills and capacities with a tendency towards moderation. This may be why the contacts have (according to my participant-observer’s assessment) continued being evidential as much as life-enhancing (or health promoting), informing, mostly coherent and productive over the years and why the particular messages received pertaining to December 21st, 2012 may be worth considering.

There’s no doubt that these contacts will continue and that new information will be gradually forthcoming and added to a growing and maturing corpus. For instance, the somewhat naïve, over-idealized and exclusivist attitude of considering that abduction events were “not genuine ET contact events” was gradually outgrown. New contactees (in personal or group contacts) do regularly arise in this long-lasting, friendly experience which transcends the multifaceted but power-driven contact styles harbored in larger, more individualistic, impersonal, competitive and developed cultures functioning under rigid social systems geared to impose order. This contact information should be studied, compared and analyzed along with that also apparently given to other contactees that have shown evidence of objective and evidential physical contacts preferably within a support group which is integrally respected and –also preferably- which was also given ample opportunities to elicit their own verifying experiences.

While Mission Rahma’s received corpus of information (sometimes identical or complementary information was simultaneously received by separate individuals) may also suffer from an unknown degree of distortion and misinterpretation it certainly is a work in progress. In contrast with individualized contact experiences, with sporadic apparently unintended contacts and with many different kinds of abduction-related experiences, the predominantly cohesive, friendly, healthy, easygoing but hardworking and altruistically dedicated processes these contact groups undertook through the years could be taken as models for healthy contact procedures.


Further Reading

A complete “Physical Contact Report” written by Ricardo Gonzalez about the most recent contact event and translated into English is forthcoming. Nevertheless, some Facebook posted images can now be seen here.

There’s an informative skeptics blog regarding misconceptions about the 2012 alignment here.

The outstanding researcher William Hamilton III also gives us an interesting perspective here.





Pin It

The “Imaginal” & Sergeant Clifford Stone’s ET Friends

By Giorgio Piacenza

New book by Clifford Stone available at – click image

The “visitors” whom retired U.S. Army Sergeant Clifford Stone describes are “three dimensional” in the sense of being more alive and humanly genuine than the rote expectations with which they are frequently portrayed. These “visitors” for him are real persons, not robotic-like conscious minds that have no similarities with human understandings. Nevertheless, he also describes a variety of these entities including his early life friend “Corona”. They can be greenish (and less believable if described due to the “little green men” cliché phrase); they can be indistinguishable from “us” (“us” referring to who? white Nordic humans because if they had been like the “Negritos” from the Philippines or like the pigmies from Congo would they have still been considered “like us”?). Apparently, according to Stone, some are types of “greys” and some are not but, interestingly, he says that all of them have what could be termed an “alter dimensional” aspect. This is particularly valid for me who after years of considering how might ET “visitors” generally operate think that a key lies in being able to interact with what in simple, colloquial terms could be called the “Astral World.” I think that “they” can come from different universes or “coherent molecular spaces” (as mentioned in Sergeant Stone’s interviews) which have different degrees of interaction with the Astral (or Subtle) World whose objective exteriors causally respond to subjective input. The more fused or actively related with the Astral World a physical universe might be, the more flexible and “unphysical” and the more subjectively responsive it might also be.

Since this essay recognizes Sergeant Stone’s emphasis upon friendship I’m going to join the ranks calling him a “friend” (a friend of humanity and by extension of mine) and refer to him as “Clifford.” Clifford’s friend Mr. Joseph Zeromski states that some of the “visitors” are “mischievous” and at the same time he also expresses that they are more spiritually evolved. Perhaps understanding the inner workings of the living Kosmos and being able to apply this understanding in their lifestyles and technologies may in some sense for some be equivalent to thinking about all of these beings as more “spiritually evolved.” Perhaps even an evil entity could be understood like this from a limited human perspective focused upon denser physical matter. However, entities with a practical reach into the Astral World might not necessarily have the same intentions of the kindest persons on Earth. It might mean that they understand more and operate more under some shared rules whether under their own enthusiasm or by a forced need to do so.

Both Clifford and Joseph Zeromski mention or imply that friendship is not only possible with extraterrestrial entities but desirable. They also say that people normally tend to ask the wrong questions in relation to ETS, for instance mostly thinking in terms of technologies that can be turned into weapons and not thinking in terms of the personal, cultural and social lives of the “visitors.” I agree as understanding the cultural, social, psychological and spiritual dimensions of the “visitors” should be of paramount importance to establish a solid, long-term relation with them and to better understand our own history and role in the living Kosmos. Clifford speaks of variety and complexity in relation to extraterrestrials and that, typically, persons involved in UFO research may only be dealing with the “tip of the iceberg.”

Clifford also tells us that, after his son died under strange coincidences/circumstances (not likely related to a military operation) and after he was taken out of his physical body by his ET friend Corona to visit his departed son (he would only remember the encounter with his son before the definitive threshold separating the low-physical Astral World from what could be called “Heaven” or a full-fledged, more enlightened level in that Astral World), he heard and saw an evil shadow “face” who told him that they could kill him if they wanted to. This was followed by another voice that said that he was not to be killed. Were these entities “extraterrestrials” or were they some of the spiritual entities behind the main “good vs. evil” dramas played on Planet Earth? Are they attempting to pull the strings in disfavor of the highest potentials of the human world? I have a feeling that they are of the latter category and remember that in the Bible is the admonition that our real enemies are not of this world.

The SOM-101 Manual referred to by Clifford and other alleged official instructions to deal with the “visitors” mention guidelines such as “official denial,” “discredit witnesses,” “deceptive statements,” “securing an evidence area out of those without a need to know” and managing a “press blackout.” Well, this probably means that persons with the same level of consciousness as the average “out of the loop” citizen are following the basic reaction to a threat. Acting as society’s “superego” under the systems permission the denial of those “in the loop” is imposed upon the non-military, or upon the “out of the loop” collective majority which, after all, for the most part at this stage of the game seems to prefer not to know or to deny the facts by turning UFO ET issues into jokes. With this attitude, the personal (First Person Subjective), cultural (Second Person Relational) and the social (Third Person Systemic) “dimensions” of any real, living being are relegated to non-issues and the typical perspective on extraterrestrial entities (whether from those in the know and those not in the know) becomes easily trivialized and “mono dimensional.”

In this fashion the “visitors” are normally experienced as OBJECTS and not as conscious, feeling, experiencing entities as alive as we are. Then, since the human mind can theorize and remain distant or uninvolved from a Third Person perspective it becomes easier to handle or manage the “visitors” without commitment and essential subjectively felt respect much as civilians of an enemy country are easily bombed from an airplane when soldiers are given a theoretical reason by authorities.

Interestingly, Clifford’s preparation for the job he experienced with the “visitors” started in childhood and apparently an Air force Captain “in the know” coincided with him and this led to his eventual recruitment into a secret ET research program. Could it be that Clifford had a life as an ET and that he made the agreement to assist in the human-ET relation during our era? However it was, Clifford’s “preparation” seems to have involved personal and immediate family members and social relations in which some of the ETS participated since his early childhood. In other words, it involved more aspects of a real self-conscious, intelligent, feeling being’s “dimensions” of reality and not just the distant, Third Person, theoretical style. This is probably why he was utilized by the military to communicate with the ETS and why he was tolerated when infringing some otherwise strict rules as when he liberated a “visitor” guest who felt more like a prisoner.

I would say that Clifford’s preparation was not only personal and social but also “integral” as it involved all of his being. I would also say that some of this preparation involved the “visitors’ using collective unconscious symbols such as when allegedly an ET impersonates someone else during Christmas and asks him if he wants to go to see the “boogey man” (this reminds me of Whitley Strieber’s experiences that also seem to relate with eliciting universal fears). When Clifford allegedly saw and heard a grey type of alien laughing with a “hellish laugh” and making a “crackling sound” he seems to have been not just connecting with the ET “visitor” but with this entity eliciting a direct experience with something in a collective unconscious “imaginal” realm, (a realm that might materialize or become experientially available in a physical sense under certain circumstances as Carl Jung hinted). For some reasons the reality of humans interacting with many ET visitors often takes on dreamlike-but-physical emotionally charged, symbolic characteristics. Are they interested in peeking unto some of Man’s raw creative powers?

As part of his “preparation” from childhood, Clifford also inevitably saw things against his conscious will and found that no one would listen or taken him seriously with few exceptions (his childhood friend Delbert Hudson apparently got to see some entities as well). Also, as part of his preparation to be a liaison between ETS varieties and humans he joined the Army and prepared as a military man and a patriot. He was trained in special operations to recover devices that fell on the ground and which could be potentially dangerous but had to be transported to a secure place. Nonetheless, in addition to this he must have also been trained to work on a regular job (as he states) because not every day important technological devices fall from the sky.

Clifford then, much later in life and, apparently only after the tragedy of his son’s early demise gained enough wisdom to decide to speak out in public (even perhaps against his sense of loyalty and conditioning to the military) so that other citizens would learn more of the truth. His son’s death could be considered as a “preparation” for his public role in disclosure events that followed extending his reach to a much wider group (perhaps from all potential U.S. citizens to all humans).

There’s a moment in Clifford’s 2001 Disclosure Project declaration in which he simply states that “visitors from other planets are coming here to this planet” but after reading into this straightforward and simple statement, I would say that they might be doing so not just physically (or interactive with our particular “space-time”) but also “internally” through dimensions of existence that respond or obey to our wills. In fact, how our minds affect what C. Jung and physicist W. Pauli understood as called the “imaginal” worlds may be important not just to us (when sometimes these “imaginal “worlds materialize in an objective and-or experiential way) but particularly important to the visitors whose “molecular spaces” or physical universes may be more integrated with the Astral or Subtle Realm than ours. In other words, our “astral” creative capacities may also be of great importance to them.

William F. Hamilton III (whom I consider a very good, intelligent researcher with an ample understanding on many UFO matters) brought up the issue of pre-physical “potentials.” In chapter four of his “Alien Magic,” a chapter dealing with “UFO Crashes in the Desert” William Steinman is said to have discovered that a Dr. R.I. Sarbacher suggests (in relation of a crashed or recovered ET craft) that “The activation of an electrical potential is believed to be the primary power to the reactor, though it is only a theory at present.” Well, in my view, if this “electric potential” refers to a more primary energy-as-information potential, a kind of “field” which is non vectorial, he may referring to a pre-physical element that co-exists with the Astral World or Subtle Realm as a structured information subset derived from it. I think that as exopoliticians we must reach out into this “Astral World” in order to understand many of the scientific and personal interests of our ET “visitors” and-or “friends.”

Clifford mentions that knowledge of humans surviving bodily death is important, implying that it also is scientifically and experientially important and useful for the “visitors.” This is an issue that should also be significant to exopoliticians and UFO researchers, not just because of its relation with ET technology, but because to understand the ET mindset and who we are in relation to them and to the Kosmos (in fact, in order to “enlighten up” our emerging world culture) we need to understand our implicit and explicit roles in “otherworldly” matters at large. In fact, survival research in general as much as hyper physics, free energy and the like should be more than fitting for well-rounded exopoliticians.


Paola Leopizzi Harris (2008). “Interview with Clifford Stone about Crash Retrievals and Aliens (with the help of his collaborator Joseph Zeromski).”


"This UFO-shaped Adinkra drawn by Landweber is a graphic representation of a binary error-correcting program found in the laws of physics in relation to Superstring Theory. Physicist James Gates discovered this pattern and may show that our universe is programed and even possessing error-correcting codes

Ethics of Transdimensional Extraterrestrials

By Giorgio Piacenza Cabrera

 "This UFO-shaped Adinkra drawn by Landweber is a graphic representation of a binary error-correcting program found in the laws of physics in relation to Superstring Theory. Physicist James Gates discovered this pattern and may show that our universe is programed and even possessing error-correcting codes
Is this a sign that transdimensional information controls reality? This UFO-shaped “Adinkra” (drawn by Landweber) represents a binary, error-correcting program discovered by Superstring & Supersymmetry physicist Sylvester James Gates.

I think that -upon coming in contact with our particular physical reality- extraterrestrials equally acquire internal limitations in relation to each other and to us and must therefore follow a careful kind of engagement with Humanity and this would impinge upon what we would consider their “ethics.” Many of us have asked are extraterrestrials “benevolent” or “malevolent”?  Are some “benevolent” and some “malevolent” or are we only imposing our human standards onto them? Opinions are heated and there might be good reasons for any of those evaluations while -typically-  we might be emotionally attached to any of these. However, I think that the issue needs to be more intelligently considered and we might make progress.  The simple answer might be “both” and “neither” but let me start from the beginning.

“False Flag,” human-created, ET invasions would be events which cater to a primitive –or rather naïve- way of experiencing the world, one dependent upon external, physical manipulation. If the “container” or “conveyor” of physical experiences itself (what we currently call “space-time”) can be modified, the relational situation among ETS with this capability would not be what we normally expect. An “either-or” issue is normally more limited to a mechanistic, classical science. According to my ongoing research on the origins of physical reality, modifying physical space-time first requires connecting more intensely with specific patterns in the metaphysically prior “Astral” “Subtle” or Mental” Realm…a realm (unlike the physical universe we are more consciously aware of) of immediate, interior, subjective expression; a realm in which mental objects manifest in the exterior or shared experiential “space” “after” the primacy of interior, subjective insights.  While “time” in a physical universe can be primarily understood as allowing distinct, sequential, experiences or intuitive apprehensions (in Whitehead’s sense), “time” in the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm can be understood as allowing exterior experiential objects to coincide with interior-subjective insights in any order suitable to that interiority. In both cases “time” allows distinctions to be made as perfect experiential unity is neither of the Physical nor of the Astral-Subtle-Mental realms. While in the Physical Realm (composed of conceivable and possible physical universes) exterior objects limit experiential insights within an exterior order in the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm exterior objects would accommodate or directly respond to insights. The degree of denial of the latter would determine how “physical” a universe is.

If there’s any truth in relation to any fundamental shift being introduced by a pre-quantum realm “code” or “signal” stemming from the center of our galaxy in December 21st, 2012, it may have to do with a Astral-Subtle-Mental reprogramming of patterns that affect what is possible in our experience of the physical universe. For us the change might occur gradually rather than in a “quantum leap” kind of way and it might just manifest as an increased way in which our physical reality might be able to interact with the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm and with subtler physical universes. Connections will probably naturally open with physical universes whose systemic components resonate with precisely defined greater or more inclusive degrees of interaction with the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm. According to some contactees from the Mission Rahma group, this recoding of fundamental Subtle Realm patterns affecting “our” physical universe might affect extraterrestrials more immediately and intensely than what we’ll experience.

I think that physical universes are specifically regulated and depend (for their specific fundamental values and degree of macro-experiential separation from their own negentropy (or degree of synergistic causality obtained from combining with its own negentropic states) upon specific limitations imposed upon the more fundamental Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm whose shared experiential “spaces” or exteriors respond to the mind without the experiential limitations or “dimensions” which we call “duration” or “distance.” The amount of asymmetry introduced to that Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm is concomitant to how “physical” and limited to inertia, entropy, experiential delay and separate objective causes-effect relations a particular physical universe is. This asymmetry would also separate the macro-scale, entropic, time-forward causality we are ordinarily conscious of, from the micro-scale, negentropic, probably associated retro causality we are ordinarily unaware of or tend to occasionally perceive in a subconscious, dream-like, precognitive or altered state.  Nevertheless, both causalities seem to remain symmetrical at the quantum relativistically-invariant level of unobserved events as suggested by the Klein-Gordon Equation. That our universe might be designed, specified and “programmed” might be reflected in the “Adinkras” drawn by Gregory D. Landweber which (according to superstring physicist Silvester James Gates) apparently represent error-correcting, binary programs accompanying the physical laws of our physical universe.

Being able to reconnect both complementary causal and retrocausal, time-forward and time-backward probably but (in so far as they coincide, “actual” or “real”) physical spaces would “increase the gauge symmetry” (as Dr. William A. Tiller might say) and would require (as Dr. William A. Tiller might also say) an intervention from the subjacent Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm common to both and whose “intervention capability” or what would correspond to Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm “quanta of action” might operate both at speeds below C and above C (the speed of light in the vacuum). In fact, particular subsets of that metaphysically prior realm of physical consequence may be stably interactive with the “akashic” vacuum plenum that may sustain all realm levels and qualitatively different kinds of realities thus also sustaining our specific physical universe.

I think that would matter most to adavanced ET beings would be the ability to experience while structuring information knowing quite well that all levels of the Cosmos are defined but interactive, pliable and ultimately not “Real.”Being able to manipulate the possibilities of EXPERIENCE and the INFORMATION which structures experiential objects by manipulating what we call “dimensions,” “space” and “time,” impinges upon the “rules of collective engagement” among different “transdimensional” ET species. This makes these “rules” more sophisticated than what we normally think as most of us in this physical Earth are still limited to a parochial, animalistic (predator-prey effective) sense of macro-level, material “reality.” In this way of experiencing “reality” exterior physical actions dominate and we are instinctively used to “dangers” coming from the outside. Nevertheless, trying to impose one’s will or to satisfy one’s species’ needs primarily through physically external actions and technologies would make no sense if the manipulation of EXPERIENCE and of object-structuring INFORMATION depends upon the sensitive issue of shared inner “spaces.” These are relational “spaces” and relational “spaces” cannot be ignored to sustain a subjective sense of being and technological advancement would force a deeper kind of relational “space.” Upon entering our physical world the extraterrestrial inner relational spaces would be compromised. Thus, agreements among transdimensional ET species would have to take this into account as shared inner “spaces” have to be respected. Another way to say it is that, in order to interact with our physical reality, the ETS “imaginal” worlds (in the Jungian sense) would be compromised. These worlds are Astral-Subtle-Mental but do generate physical effects and would generate physical effects in the particular physical universe they come from. Thus, having to share aspects of their “imaginal worlds” in order to interact with our particular physical reality would imperil the realm where their subjective experiences (most intimately linked to their sense of being) unfold. Their first person, subjective experiences inevitably linked to a shared, second person “we-generating” relational Astral-Subtle-Mental “space”  in turn linked to the production of the particular physical reality they want to interact with would be affected if they intervened too aggressively or distorted how we perceive and experience our physical reality.

It is not a simple as saying that we are imposing our “good and evil” prejudices and dichotomies upon “them” or as saying that all of them have a benevolent intention because they have overcome dichotomous thinking. Generally speaking, “they” may have different histories, inclinations, needs motivations and agendas but their interaction with our physical reality would open them to certain perils. Through acquiring Earth human Astral-Subtle-Mental patterns, the way “they” experience their agentic or volitional selves in their stable physical universe might acquire characteristics related to a distortion imposed on us. Expression vehicles internal to their agentic or volitional selves could be altered. The different sets of engagement ethics with physical Earth humans could be primarily contrived and rationally-objectively accepted or primarily adopted from a willing and subjective initiative.  The former would be like a rational, objective, “third person,” practical “gentlemen’s agreement” so as not to imperil Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm experiential vehicles mutually internal to all ET species involved (when interacting with the particular physical universe in which our Earth humanity manifests. The latter would be like a more synergistic, spontaneous, “first person” subjectively-initiated desire to enhance the lives of all entities involved in these multiple reality interphases. In either case, we would not see external, overt invasion tactics as most “False Flag” ET invasion scenarios would apparently simulate. The demands of a higher realm “subtlety”, so to speak, would impose similar complications on all extraterrestrial participants.

Being able to manipulate the same space-time while sharing the same Astral-Subtle-Mental  experiential “space” would change the “ball game” as few ET civilizations would risk disarraying their internal Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm order with which their people experience their unique interpretive sense of reality. Thus, there would be a mechanism in place to deter or intercept the few “rogue” transdimensionally-capable ETS not playing by the rules. The same mechanism would force ET entities with different needs, motivations and agendas to respect each other and not to intervene beyond what is minimally required. Those not willing to maintain the general agreed-upon safety of all ET civilizations with a stake on humanity and physical Earth would be sifted out.

The degree of reconnection (or of mutually canceling) of the causal and retrocausal or of the primarily entropic and negentropic complementary physical aspects that originally spring from the (duration cero and distance cero) mental object-manifesting objective exteriors corresponding to the  Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm would generate various degrees of more or less “ethereal” and more or less “dense” physical universes. Some of these universes would allegedly be the ones from which many ET species originate. They would still be “physical” as their intuitive experiential grasp would follow from exterior objects (however syntropic and synchronistic that experience might be). When the mutual cancellation of the causal and retrocausal “split” is complete, we would not be speaking of “physical universes” any longer as experience would not manifest through the use of exterior objects interacting under the “dimensions” of distance and delay.

The subsets of the Astral-Subtle-Mental Realm components of visiting extraterrestrials (subsets impinging upon their own physical realities and timelines) become shared internal components with us when they shift their vibratory states in order to resonate and relate with our physical universe. This means that the Astral-Subtle-Mental a previous potential agentic or volitionally active aspect of their selves becomes actual or active and coincidental with ours. Again, these subsets (required to relate with our physical universe) would become “actual” from a previous (non-interactive) “potential” state and, as being components that manifest our physical universe now coincide with their own actual and agentic interior experiences. These Astral-Subtle-Mental subsets of extraterrestrial physical universes that would now coincide with the same Astral-Subtle-Mental subsets that generate our particular physical universe and kind of experiences would also become common to all the ET species physically interacting with us. In other words, the patterns would be incorporated and would become internal or free-will responding to their own agency, to our agency and to the agency of any being interacting with our physical universe and timeline. This would not just impose responsibilities but also restrictions and inherent safeguards.

Copyright © 2018 Exopolitics Institute News Service. All Rights Reserved.